Hermes 3 70B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Hermes 3 70B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
29–77 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
29–77 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 43.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.8
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 51.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
11–30 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 43.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Nous Research
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 14 August 2024
- Authors
- teknium, Jeffrey Quesnelle, Chen Guang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering
- Base model
- Llama 3.1-70B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- 270,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 3
70B
390M tokens (Table 1)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 5.8 × 10²⁰ FLOP
6 FLOP / token / parameter * 70*10^9 parameters * 390*10^6 tokens * 3 epochs = 4.914e+20 FLOP 989500000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec * 648 GPU-hours * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 6.9249168e+20 FLOP sqrt(4.914e+20*6.9249168e+20) = 5.8334416e+20
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chips used
- 48
- Chip-hours
- 648
- Power draw
- 66.2 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- NousResearch
Llama license https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-70B
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hermes 3 Technical Report
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Hermes 3 70B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Hermes 3 70B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
34.9 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
Hermes 3 70B reaches a parameter count of 70B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.
The entry point is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 25.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 48.4 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Hermes 3 70B was published by Nous Research, in the country recorded as United States of America, during August 2024. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering.
It builds on Llama 3.1-70B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation NousResearch.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 17.1 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 50 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
It was trained on a corpus of about 270,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Hermes 3 70B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Hermes 3 70B, needing around 34.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Hermes 3 70B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for Hermes 3 70B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of Hermes 3 70B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond Hermes 3 70B.
Answers
Hermes 3 70B — common questions
Hermes 3 70B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Hermes 3 70B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 29–77 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Hermes 3 70B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 34.9 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.
Hermes 3 70B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 50.
Hermes 3 70B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 34.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Hermes 3 70B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Hermes 3 70B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 70B. 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Hermes 3 70B— who created it?
It was published by Nous Research, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Hermes 3 70B— when was it released?
It was published in August 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Hermes 3 70B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Hermes 3 70B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation NousResearch. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Hermes 3 70B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 14.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Hermes 3 70B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.