Smaug-72B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 24.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
47.1 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Smaug-72B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.1
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
47.1
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.1
tok/s
18–48 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.7
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
28.7
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
27.5
tok/s
17–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 40.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.2
tok/s
14–37 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.2
tok/s
13–34 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.6 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.4
tok/s
12–31 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 40.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
17.4
tok/s
10–28 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
17.4
tok/s
10–28 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Abacus AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 3 July 2024
- Authors
- Arka Pal, Deep Karkhanis, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Siddartha Naidu, Colin White
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Base model
- Qwen-72B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 72B
- Training data
- tokens
For 72B, we start from MoMo-72b-lora-1.8.7-DPO [Moreh, 2024], which itself is a fine-tune of Qwen72B [Bai et al., 2023]. MoMo-72b-lora-1.8.7-DPO has already undergone SFT, so we simply run the DPOP routines as in Smaug-34B.
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Hardware
- Fine-tuning compute
- 8.2 × 10²⁰ FLOP
989400000000000 FLOP/GPU/sec * 96 hours * 3600 sec / hour * 8 GPUs * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 820647936000000000000 FLOP "Likely" confidence because of the uncertainty with the number of hours, see training time notes
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chips used
- 8
- Wall-clock time
- 96 hours
- Power draw
- 11.1 kW
" We run these experiments with 8 H100 GPUs (each with 80GB)" " The total training time is 144 hours." (I assume it is total for 2 models: 72B and 34B -> ~48 hours for 34B model, ~96 hours for 72B model)
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- abacusai
Apache 2.0 https://github.com/abacusai/smaug https://huggingface.co/abacusai/Smaug-72B-v0.1
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Smaug-72B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.1 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.8 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.8 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.7 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.7 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 27.5 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Smaug-72B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.4 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.5 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 11.6 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
35.9 GB
Fastest
47.1 tok/s
Smaug-72B sits at 72B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 61 of the cards we track can hold it.
At the low end, a A100 PCIe 40 GB handles it — 40 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 24.8 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 47.1 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
Smaug-72B was published by Abacus AI, in United States of America, in July 2024. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Its starting point was Qwen-72B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the abacusai organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 16.6 tokens per second, and 51 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Smaug-72B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Look at what Smaug-72B actually needs — around 35.9 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Smaug-72B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Smaug-72B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for Smaug-72B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 47.1 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Smaug-72B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Smaug-72B.
Answers
Smaug-72B — common questions
How fast is Smaug-72B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 47.1 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 51 of the cards that can run Smaug-72B clear that.
How much VRAM does Smaug-72B need?
About 35.9 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Smaug-72B open source?
Its weights are published, so Smaug-72B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Smaug-72B have?
Smaug-72B has 72B parameters. For 72B, we start from MoMo-72b-lora-1.8.7-DPO [Moreh, 2024], which itself is a fine-tune of Qwen72B [Bai et al., 2023]. MoMo-72b-lora-1.8.7-DPO has already undergone SFT, so we simply run the DPOP routines as in Smaug-34B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Smaug-72B?
Smaug-72B was published by Abacus AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Smaug-72B released?
Smaug-72B was published in July 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Smaug-72B used for?
Smaug-72B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Smaug-72B?
Its weights are published under the abacusai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Smaug-72B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Smaug-72B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 15.5 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Smaug-72B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 61 cards already able to run Smaug-72B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Smaug-72B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Smaug-72B, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Smaug-72B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 28–75 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Smaug-72B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Smaug-72B is the A100 PCIe 40 GB, with 40 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 35.9 GB, and produces roughly 24.8 tokens per second. 61 cards in total can run it.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.