DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
H200 NVL
141 GB · Q3_K_M · 23.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
33.2 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
9 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.2
tok/s
20–53 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 143.5 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
23.7
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 116.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
23.7
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 116.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
14.4
tok/s
9–23 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 253.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
13.3
tok/s
8–21 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 171.0 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
13.3
tok/s
8–21 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 171.0 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
12.2
tok/s
7–20 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 198.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
11.5
tok/s
7–18 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 253.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
11.5
tok/s
7–18 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 253.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- DeepSeek
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 17 June 2024
- Authors
- Qihao Zhu, Daya Guo, Zhihong Shao, Dejian Yang, Peiyi Wang, Runxin Xu, Y. Wu, Yukun Li, Huazuo Gao, Shirong Ma, Wangding Zeng, Xiao Bi, Zihui Gu, Hanwei Xu, Damai Dai, Kai Dong, Liyue Zhang, Yishi Piao, Zhibin Gou, Zhenda Xie, Zhewen Hao, Bingxuan Wang, Junxiao Song, Deli Chen, Xin Xie, Kang Guan, Yuxiang You, Aixin Liu, Qiushi Du, Wenjun Gao, Xuan Lu, Qinyu Chen, Yaohui Wang, Chengqi Deng, Jiashi…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Code generation, Code autocompletion
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Base model
- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B)
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 236B
- Training data
- 3,191,000,000,000 tokens
- Batch size
- 36,864,000
Mixture of experts model. 21B parameters activated per token.
"In the pre-training phase, the dataset of DeepSeek-Coder-V2 is created with a composition of 60% source code, 10% math corpus, and 30% natural language corpus ... The source code consists of 1,170B code-related tokens sourced from GitHub and CommonCrawl... For the math corpus, we collect 221B math-related tokens sourced from CommonCrawl... In total, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 has been exposed to 10.2T training tokens, where 4.2 trillion tokens originate from the DeepSeek V2 dataset, while the remaining …
Most training is done at batch size of 36,864. They do long context training: "In the first stage, we utilize a sequence length of 32K and a batch size of 1152 for 1000 steps. In the second stage, we train the model for an additional 1000 steps, employing a sequence length of 128K and a batch size of 288 sequences" 128k*288 = 36,864,000
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
Trained on a total of 10.2T tokens 6NC: 6 * 10.2T * 21B active parameters = 1.285e24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Data centre
- The paper does not mention any hardware, GPUs or any information regarding the hardware used.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- deepseek-ai
license has some harmful use restrictions: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2/blob/main/LICENSE-MODEL no training code
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
New SOTA on Aider, AIME 2024, and Math Odyssey benchmarks (including against proprietary models such as Claude 3 Opus, GPT-4o and GPT-4 Turbo). Note that Figure 1 appears to show the new model getting SOTA for several other benchmarks, but omits results from GPT-4o which wins in most cases.
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q4_K_M 33.2 tok/s
- 02 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q3_K_M 23.7 tok/s
- 03 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q3_K_M 23.7 tok/s
- 04 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 14.4 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 13.3 tok/s
- 06 Radeon Instinct MI308X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 13.3 tok/s
- 07 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q6_K 12.2 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 11.5 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 11.5 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 H200 NVL 141 GB · needs 116.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 02 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · needs 116.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 03 B200 180 GB · needs 143.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 33.2 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · needs 171.0 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 13.3 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI308X 192 GB · needs 171.0 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 13.3 tok/s
- 06 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · needs 198.4 GB · Q6_K · tight 12.2 tok/s
- 07 B300 288 GB · needs 253.4 GB · Q8_0 · tight 14.4 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · needs 253.4 GB · Q8_0 · tight 11.5 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · needs 253.4 GB · Q8_0 · tight 11.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
H200 NVL
Memory needed
116.0 GB
Fastest
33.2 tok/s
At 236B parameters, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B is beyond what any single graphics card holds. Running it means either splitting it across several cards or renting hardware built for the job — 9 of the cards we track can hold it on their own, and all of them are datacentre parts.
The least hardware that works is a H200 NVL. Its 141 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 23.7 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 33.2 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B was published by DeepSeek, in China, in June 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing code generation, Code autocompletion.
It is derived from DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B) rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 13.3 tokens per second, and 9 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
How it was trained
Producing it required around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
It was trained on about 3,191,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B — around 116.0 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 33.2 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B.
Answers
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B — common questions
How many parameters does DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B have?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B has 236B parameters. Mixture of experts model. 21B parameters activated per token. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B was published by DeepSeek, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B released?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B was published in June 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B used for?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B works in Language, and is recorded as handling code generation, Code autocompletion. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
Its weights are published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
Around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 28.3 GB. Our figures for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 9 cards already able to run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B appears at 5 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 20–53 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B is the H200 NVL, with 141 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 116.0 GB, and produces roughly 23.7 tokens per second. 9 cards in total can run it.
How fast is DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 33.2 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 9 of the cards that can run DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B clear that.
How much VRAM does DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B need?
About 116.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B open source?
Its weights are published, so DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.