Qwen2-72B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 24.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
46.6 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen2-72B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.6
tok/s
40–56 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
46.6
tok/s
40–56 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.2
tok/s
22–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.2
tok/s
22–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.8
tok/s
18–48 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.5
tok/s
24–34 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.5
tok/s
24–34 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.4
tok/s
24–34 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 59.6 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.4
tok/s
24–34 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 59.6 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
27.3
tok/s
16–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.2
tok/s
21–30 |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 42.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
24.5
tok/s
21–29 |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 34.2 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.5
tok/s
21–29 |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 34.2 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.5
tok/s
21–29 |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 34.2 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.2
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.2
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.2
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.0
tok/s
20–28 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.0
tok/s
18–25 |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 51.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
19.6
tok/s
17–23 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.6
tok/s
17–23 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.6
tok/s
17–23 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.0
tok/s
15–22 |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 42.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.3
tok/s
15–21 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 59.6 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.3
tok/s
15–21 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 59.6 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 7 June 2024
- Authors
- An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jianxin Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Chen, Kexin Yang, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Na Ni, Pei Zhang, Peng W…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 72.7B
- Training data
- 7,000,000,000,000 tokens
72.71B parameters in total, of which 70.21B are non-embedding parameters
"All models were pre-trained on a high-quality, large-scale dataset comprising over 7 trillion tokens, covering a wide range of domains and languages."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
72 billion params, 7 trillion tokens 6 * 72 billion * 7 trillion ~= 3.02e24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Data centre
- There is no paper to reference, no information about hardware used for training found in media.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
Apache 2.0
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- Training cost
- Record confidence
- Confident
SOTA claims are against open source models within a parameter class. Possibly high training cost, at 3e24 FLOP seems borderline.
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hello Qwen2
- Last updated
- 18 December 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Qwen2-72B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 46.6 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 46.6 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.2 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.2 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 29.8 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.5 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.5 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.4 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.4 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 27.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen2-72B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.0 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.6 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 42.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 10.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
34.2 GB
Fastest
46.6 tok/s
Qwen2-72B sits at 72.7B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 61 of the cards we track can hold it.
The least hardware that works is a A100 PCIe 40 GB. Its 40 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 24.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 46.6 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
Qwen2-72B was published by Alibaba, in China, in June 2024. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 16.4 tokens per second, and 50 exceed reading speed outright.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
It was trained on about 7,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is training cost.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen2-72B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold Qwen2-72B — around 34.2 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Qwen2-72B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Qwen2-72B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second for Qwen2-72B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 46.6 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage Qwen2-72B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Qwen2-72B.
Answers
Qwen2-72B — common questions
What GPU do I need to run Qwen2-72B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Qwen2-72B is the A100 PCIe 40 GB, with 40 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 34.2 GB, and produces roughly 24.5 tokens per second. 61 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Qwen2-72B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 46.6 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 50 of the cards that can run Qwen2-72B clear that.
How much VRAM does Qwen2-72B need?
About 34.2 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Qwen2-72B open source?
Its weights are published, so Qwen2-72B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Qwen2-72B have?
Qwen2-72B has 72.7B parameters. 72.71B parameters in total, of which 70.21B are non-embedding parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Qwen2-72B?
Qwen2-72B was published by Alibaba, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Qwen2-72B released?
Qwen2-72B was published in June 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Qwen2-72B used for?
Qwen2-72B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Qwen2-72B?
Its weights are published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Qwen2-72B?
Around 3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Qwen2-72B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Qwen2-72B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 13.8 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Qwen2-72B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 61 of the cards we track already hold Qwen2-72B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Qwen2-72B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Qwen2-72B has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Qwen2-72B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 40–56 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.