Me Llama 70B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · IQ4_XS · 23.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Me Llama 70B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 56.2 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 56.2 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
22–31 |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 39.9 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
20–29 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
23.2
tok/s
20–28 |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 35.8 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
23.2
tok/s
20–28 |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 35.8 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
23.2
tok/s
20–28 |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 35.8 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 72.5 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
16–22 |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 39.9 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 56.2 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 56.2 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 56.2 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Yale School of Medicine,University of Florida,University of Texas Health Science Center
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 20 February 2024
- Authors
- Qianqian Xie, Qingyu Chen, Aokun Chen, Cheng Peng, Yan Hu, Fongci Lin, Xueqing Peng, Jimin Huang, Jeffrey Zhang, Vipina Keloth, Xinyu Zhou, Lingfei Qian, Huan He, Dennis Shung, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Yonghui Wu, Hua Xu, Jiang Bian
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language, Medicine
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Medical diagnosis, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification, Text summarization
- Base model
- Llama 2-70B
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- 129,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
70B
"129B pre-training tokens and 214K instruction tuning samples from diverse biomedical and clinical data sources"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
- Fine-tuning compute
- 4.3 × 10²² FLOP
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 70 * 10^9 parameters * 129 * 10^9 pre-training tokens [instruction-tuning is negligible] = 5.418e+22 FLOP 312000000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec [A100, bf16] * 100000 GPU-hours * 3600 sec/ hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 3.3696e+22 FLOP sqrt(3.3696e+22 * 5.418e+22) = 4.2727617e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Chip-hours
- 100,000
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
MIT license + llama 2 restirctions + PhysioNet Credentialed Health DUA 1.5.0 https://github.com/BIDS-Xu-Lab/Me-LLaMA
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Me LLaMA: Foundation Large Language Models for Medical Applications
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Me Llama 70B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Me Llama 70B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.8 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.2 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.8 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.2 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.8 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.2 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 39.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
35.8 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
Me Llama 70B reaches a parameter count of 70B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.
The entry point is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 23.2 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 48.4 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Me Llama 70B was published by Yale School of Medicine,University of Florida,University of Texas Health Science Center, in the country recorded as United States of America, during February 2024. The category the publisher falls under is academia,Academia,Academia.
It works in the domain of Language, Medicine, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Medical diagnosis, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification, Text summarization.
It builds on Llama 2-70B. Most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
How fast it runs, and why
The median result is around 17.1 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 49 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
What went into building it
Training consumed a corpus of around 129,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Me Llama 70B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Me Llama 70B, needing around 35.8 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Me Llama 70B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Me Llama 70B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Me Llama 70B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Me Llama 70B.
Answers
Me Llama 70B — common questions
Me Llama 70B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 49.
Me Llama 70B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 35.8 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Me Llama 70B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Me Llama 70B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 70B. 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Me Llama 70B— who created it?
It was published by Yale School of Medicine,University of Florida,University of Texas Health Science Center, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as academia,Academia,Academia.
Me Llama 70B— when was it released?
It was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Me Llama 70B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, Medicine, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Medical diagnosis, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification, Text summarization. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Me Llama 70B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Me Llama 70B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 11.1 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Me Llama 70B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Me Llama 70B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Me Llama 70B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 41–58 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Me Llama 70B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 35.8 GB, and produces roughly 23.2 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.