Qwen1.5-72B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Radeon Instinct MI200
64 GB · IQ4_XS · 18.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
47.1 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen1.5-72B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
43 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.1
tok/s
40–56 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
47.1
tok/s
40–56 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.3
tok/s
30–42 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
35.3
tok/s
30–42 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
33.7
tok/s
29–40 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
30.1
tok/s
18–48 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.2
tok/s
25–35 |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 55.6 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
28.8
tok/s
24–35 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.8
tok/s
24–35 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.7
tok/s
24–34 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
28.7
tok/s
24–34 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
28.7
tok/s
24–34 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
27.5
tok/s
17–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 93.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.4
tok/s
18–26 |
H800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
20.4
tok/s
17–24 |
A100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 68.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 4 February 2024
- Authors
- Qwen Team
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 72B
- Training data
- 3,000,000,000,000 tokens
72B
3 trillion tokens from this response https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen2/issues/97
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
3T training tokens: https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen2/issues/97 6 * 72 billion * 3 trillion = ~1.3e24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Data centre
- There is no paper to reference, no information about hardware used for training found in media.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
restriction on >100m monthly users: https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen1.5-72B/blob/main/LICENSE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
#1 in C-Eval (84.1, better than Qwen-72B. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen1.5/, https://cevalbenchmark.com/static/leaderboard.html)
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Introducing Qwen1.5
- Last updated
- 18 December 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen1.5-72B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 05 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q5_K_M 35.3 tok/s
- 06 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q5_K_M 35.3 tok/s
- 07 H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB · 3,940 GB/s · Q6_K 33.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.1 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 64 GB 64 GB · 2,020 GB/s · IQ4_XS 29.2 tok/s
- 10 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.8 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen1.5-72B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Jetson T4000 64 GB · needs 55.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 4.0 tok/s
- 02 H100 SXM5 64 GB 64 GB · needs 55.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 29.2 tok/s
- 03 Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB 64 GB · needs 55.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 3.0 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI200 64 GB · needs 55.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI210 64 GB · needs 55.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 06 RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell 72 GB · needs 59.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.2 tok/s
- 07 H100 CNX 80 GB · needs 68.1 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 21.4 tok/s
- 08 H800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.1 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 21.4 tok/s
- 09 H800 SXM5 80 GB · needs 68.1 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 35.3 tok/s
- 10 A800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.1 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 20.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Radeon Instinct MI200
Memory needed
55.6 GB
Fastest
47.1 tok/s
Qwen1.5-72B sits at 72B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 43 of the cards we track can hold it.
The entry point is the Radeon Instinct MI200: 64 GB of memory, IQ4_XS compression, roughly 18.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 47.1 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Background
Qwen1.5-72B was published by Alibaba, in China, in February 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.4 tokens per second, and 39 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
How it was trained
Producing it required around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
It was trained on about 3,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen1.5-72B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Qwen1.5-72B — around 55.6 GB at IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Qwen1.5-72B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Qwen1.5-72B — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for Qwen1.5-72B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 47.1 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs Qwen1.5-72B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Qwen1.5-72B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Qwen1.5-72B — common questions
How much VRAM does Qwen1.5-72B need?
About 55.6 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Qwen1.5-72B open source?
Its weights are published, so Qwen1.5-72B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Qwen1.5-72B have?
Qwen1.5-72B has 72B parameters. 72B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Qwen1.5-72B?
Qwen1.5-72B was published by Alibaba, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Qwen1.5-72B released?
Qwen1.5-72B was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Qwen1.5-72B used for?
Qwen1.5-72B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Qwen1.5-72B?
Its weights are published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Qwen1.5-72B?
Around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Qwen1.5-72B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Qwen1.5-72B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 16.6 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Qwen1.5-72B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Qwen1.5-72B only if one card cannot hold it — 43 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Qwen1.5-72B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Qwen1.5-72B, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Qwen1.5-72B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 40–56 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Qwen1.5-72B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Qwen1.5-72B is the Radeon Instinct MI200, with 64 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 55.6 GB, and produces roughly 18.5 tokens per second. 43 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Qwen1.5-72B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 47.1 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 39 of the cards that can run Qwen1.5-72B clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.