Karakuri LM TPS calculator

Open weights KARAKURI Inc. 70B parameters January 2024

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

61 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

A100 PCIe 40 GB

40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

48.4 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run Karakuri LM?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

61 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
48.4 tok/s

29–77 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
48.4 tok/s

29–77 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
38.7 tok/s

23–62 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
38.7 tok/s

23–62 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
30.9 tok/s

19–49 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
29.6 tok/s

18–47 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
29.6 tok/s

18–47 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
29.5 tok/s

18–47 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 59.3 GB Q6_K Comfortable
29.5 tok/s

18–47 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 59.3 GB Q6_K Comfortable
28.3 tok/s

17–45 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
26.1 tok/s

16–42 · low confidence

GRID A100B NVIDIA 48 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 43.0 GB Q4_K_M Tight
25.5 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s Jun 2020 34.9 GB Q3_K_M Tight
25.5 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s May 2020 34.9 GB Q3_K_M Tight
25.5 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s Nov 2022 34.9 GB Q3_K_M Tight
25.1 tok/s

15–40 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
25.1 tok/s

15–40 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
25.1 tok/s

15–40 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
23.8 tok/s

14–38 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Tight
21.8 tok/s

13–35 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA 64 GB 2,020 GB/s Mar 2023 51.2 GB Q5_K_M Tight
20.3 tok/s

12–33 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Tight
20.3 tok/s

12–33 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Tight
20.3 tok/s

12–33 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 75.6 GB Q8_0 Tight
18.7 tok/s

11–30 · low confidence

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA 48 GB 1,340 GB/s Mar 2025 43.0 GB Q4_K_M Tight
17.9 tok/s

11–29 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 59.3 GB Q6_K Comfortable
17.9 tok/s

11–29 · low confidence

A100X NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Jun 2021 59.3 GB Q6_K Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
KARAKURI Inc.
Organisation type
Industry
Country
Japan
Published
26 January 2024

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language
Task
Language modeling/generation, Chat
Base model
Llama 2-70B

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
70B

70B

Training data
tokens

If no overlap, full dataset being trained on contains as many as 8.1T tokens.

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (restricted use)

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Record confidence
Confident

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
KARAKURI LM
Last updated
28 November 2025

The extremes

What the numbers mean

Hardware requirements in practice

Minimum card

A100 PCIe 40 GB

Memory needed

34.9 GB

Fastest

48.4 tok/s

Karakuri LM reaches a parameter count of 70B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.

The entry point is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 25.5 tokens per second.

At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 48.4 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

About this model

Karakuri LM was published by KARAKURI Inc., in the country recorded as Japan, during January 2024. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Chat.

Rather than being trained from scratch, it is derived from Llama 2-70B. That is why it shares the base model's general shape and size.

Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.

How fast it runs, and why

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 17.1 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 50 of them.

Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.

Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for Karakuri LM

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Start from the memory column

    Every card here has been checked against Karakuri LM, needing around 34.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.

  2. 02

    Decide how long your conversations run

    The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Karakuri LM.

  3. 03

    Choose how far you will compress it

    Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.

  4. 04

    Sort by speed

    Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Karakuri LM. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 48.4 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Check the fit verdict before buying

    Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Karakuri LM. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.

  6. 06

    Check the card from the other side

    Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Karakuri LM.

Answers

Karakuri LM — common questions

01

Karakuri LM— would two GPUs run it faster?

Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

02

Karakuri LM— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

03

Karakuri LM— how accurate are these speed estimates?

They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 29–77 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

04

Karakuri LM— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 34.9 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.

05

Karakuri LM— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 50.

06

Karakuri LM— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 34.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

07

Karakuri LM— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

08

Karakuri LM— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 70B. 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

09

Karakuri LM— who created it?

It was published by KARAKURI Inc., based in Japan, an organisation categorised as industry.

10

Karakuri LM— when was it released?

It was published in January 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

11

Karakuri LM— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Chat. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.

12

Karakuri LM— where can I download it?

The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

13

Karakuri LM— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 14.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.