Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
22–31 |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
20–29 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
16–22 |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Trend Micro
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Japan, United States of America
- Published
- 21 April 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Base model
- Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- tokens
70b
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 4.2 × 10²¹ FLOP
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 70 * 10^9 parameters * 10 * 10^9 tokens = 4.2e+21 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- trend-cybertron
Llama 3.1 license + MIT license https://huggingface.co/trend-cybertron/Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B-Base
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B-Base
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
33.0 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B sits at 70B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 61 of the cards we track can hold it.
At the low end, a A100 PCIe 40 GB handles it — 40 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 25.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 48.4 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B was published by Trend Micro, in Japan, in April 2025. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
It is derived from Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the trend-cybertron organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 17.1 tokens per second, and 49 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B actually needs — around 33.0 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
Tight means Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B is settled.
Answers
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B — common questions
Would two GPUs run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B only if one card cannot hold it — 61 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 41–58 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B is the A100 PCIe 40 GB, with 40 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 33.0 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. 61 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 49 of the cards that can run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B clear that.
How much VRAM does Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B need?
About 33.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B open source?
Its weights are published, so Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B have?
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B has 70B parameters. 70b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B?
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B was published by Trend Micro, based in Japan, categorised as industry.
When was Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B released?
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B was published in April 2025.
What is Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B used for?
Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B?
Its weights are published under the trend-cybertron organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Llama-Primus-Nemotron-70B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 12.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.