FoxBrain TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run FoxBrain?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
29–77 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
29–77 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 43.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
15–41 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 34.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.8
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 51.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
12–33 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 75.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
11–30 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 43.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 59.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Foxconn
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Taiwan
- Published
- 10 March 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning
- Base model
- Llama 3.1-70B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- tokens
70B
"Foxconn applied data augmentation techniques, generating 98 billion tokens of pre-training data across 24 topics. "
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
- Fine-tuning compute
- 4.7 × 10²² FLOP
6 FLOP / token / parameter * 70 * 10^9 parameters * 98 * 10^9 tokens = 4.116e+22 FLOP [unknown amount of epochs] 756000000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec * 64512 GPU-hours [see training time notes] * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 5.2672758e+22 FLOP sqrt(4.116e+22*5.2672758e+22) = 4.6561902e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 PCIe
- Chips used
- 120
- Chip-hours
- 64,512
- Power draw
- 82.4 kW
- Data centre
- Taipei-1 Supercomputer facility
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- FoxconnAI
Llama 3.1 license https://huggingface.co/FoxconnAI/Llama_3.1-FoxBrain-70B
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- FoxBrain: Foxconn’s Industrial-Grade Reasoning LLM for Domain-Specific Applications
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run FoxBrain
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run FoxBrain
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 34.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 43.0 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
34.9 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
FoxBrain sits at 70B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 61 of the cards we track can hold it.
The entry point is the A100 PCIe 40 GB: 40 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 25.5 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 48.4 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
FoxBrain was published by Foxconn, in Taiwan, in March 2025. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning.
It is derived from Llama 3.1-70B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the FoxconnAI organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 17.1 tokens per second, and 50 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for FoxBrain
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what FoxBrain actually needs — around 34.9 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for FoxBrain.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of FoxBrain — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for FoxBrain. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage FoxBrain from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once FoxBrain is settled.
Answers
FoxBrain — common questions
How accurate are these FoxBrain speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 29–77 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run FoxBrain?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds FoxBrain is the A100 PCIe 40 GB, with 40 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 34.9 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. 61 cards in total can run it.
How fast is FoxBrain on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 50 of the cards that can run FoxBrain clear that.
How much VRAM does FoxBrain need?
About 34.9 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is FoxBrain open source?
Its weights are published, so FoxBrain can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does FoxBrain have?
FoxBrain has 70B parameters. 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created FoxBrain?
FoxBrain was published by Foxconn, based in Taiwan, categorised as industry.
When was FoxBrain released?
FoxBrain was published in March 2025.
What is FoxBrain used for?
FoxBrain works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download FoxBrain?
Its weights are published under the FoxconnAI organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run FoxBrain if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 14.2 GB. Our figures for FoxBrain assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run FoxBrain faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 61 cards already able to run FoxBrain alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for FoxBrain?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and FoxBrain appears at 5 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.