Qwen2.5-VL-72B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 24.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
47.1 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen2.5-VL-72B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.1
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
47.1
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
37.6
tok/s
23–60 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.1
tok/s
18–48 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
28.7
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
28.7
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
27.5
tok/s
17–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 40.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.8
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 35.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.4
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.2
tok/s
14–37 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.2
tok/s
13–34 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.6 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.8
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 77.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.4
tok/s
12–31 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 40.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
17.4
tok/s
10–28 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
17.4
tok/s
10–28 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 61.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 19 February 2025
- Authors
- Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, Junyang Lin
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language, Vision, Multimodal
- Task
- Visual question answering, Video description, Language modeling/generation, Translation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR), Quantitative reasoning
- Base model
- Qwen2.5-72B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 72B
- Training data
- tokens
The model is initialized with pre-trained weights from the Qwen2.5 LLM
Table 2 4.1T total training tokens:
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 9.6 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 1.8 × 10²⁴ FLOP
7.8e+24 FLOP [base LLM compute] + 1.7712e+24 FLOP [VL training compute] = 9.5712e+24 FLOP
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 72 * 10^9 parameters * 4.1 * 10^12 tokens = 1.7712e+24 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct Qwen license (restriction on >100m monthly users)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen2.5-VL-72B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 47.1 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 37.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.1 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.8 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 28.8 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.7 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 28.7 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 27.5 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen2.5-VL-72B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 35.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.8 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.4 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.5 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 40.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 11.6 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
35.9 GB
Fastest
47.1 tok/s
Qwen2.5-VL-72B reaches a parameter count of 72B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.
The smallest card that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 24.8 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 47.1 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Qwen2.5-VL-72B was published by Alibaba, in the country recorded as China, during February 2025. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as performing the task of visual question answering, Video description, Language modeling/generation, Translation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR), Quantitative reasoning.
Its starting point was an existing base model, Qwen2.5-72B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation Qwen.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 16.6 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 51 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 9.6 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen2.5-VL-72B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Qwen2.5-VL-72B, needing around 35.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Qwen2.5-VL-72B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for Qwen2.5-VL-72B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 47.1 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Qwen2.5-VL-72B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Qwen2.5-VL-72B.
Answers
Qwen2.5-VL-72B — common questions
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— who created it?
It was published by Alibaba, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— when was it released?
It was published in February 2025.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as handling the task of visual question answering, Video description, Language modeling/generation, Translation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR), Quantitative reasoning. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation Qwen. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 9.6 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 15.5 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 28–75 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 35.9 GB, and produces roughly 24.8 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 47.1 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 51.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 35.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Qwen2.5-VL-72B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 72B. The model is initialized with pre-trained weights from the Qwen2.5 LLM. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.