SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
22–31 |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
20–29 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
16–22 |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- AI Singapore
- Organisation type
- Government
- Country
- Singapore
- Published
- 19 December 2024
- Authors
- AI Singapore
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Base model
- Llama 3.1-70B
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- 200,000,000,000 tokens
"pre-trained on 200B tokens"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 8 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 8.3 × 10²² FLOP
Llama3.1 70B base model: 7.929e+24 Additional pretraining compute: Stage 1: 200*60*60*989500000000000*64*0.3=1.36788×10^22 Stage 2: 495*60*60*989500000000000*128*0.3=6.77103×10^22 Total: 7.929×10^24 + 1.36788×10^22 + 6.77103×10^22 = 8.0103891 × 10^24
Additional pretraining compute: Stage 1: 200 hour * 3600 sec / hour * 989500000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec * 64 GPUs * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 1.36788×10^22 FLOP Stage 2: 495 hours * 3600 sec / hour * 989500000000000 FLOP / GPU /sec * 128 GPUs * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 6.77103×10^22 FLOP 1.36788×10^22 FLOP + 6.77103×10^22 FLOP = 8.13891e+22 FLOP 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 70*10^9 parameters * 200*10^9 tokens = 8.4e+22 FLOP sqrt(8.13891e+22*8.4e+22) = 8.2684245e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H200 SXM,NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chips used
- 192
- Wall-clock time
- 136 hours
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- aisingapore
Llama 3.1 license (branding requirements, size cap 700M MAU) https://huggingface.co/aisingapore/Llama-SEA-LION-v3-70B https://github.com/aisingapore/sealion
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- SEA-LION V3
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
33.0 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B reaches a parameter count of 70B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.
The least hardware that works is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 25.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 48.4 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B was published by AI Singapore, in the country recorded as Singapore, during December 2024. The category the publisher falls under is government.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation.
Its starting point was an existing base model, Llama 3.1-70B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation aisingapore.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 17.1 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 49 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Training and provenance
Training it took a computation budget of roughly 8 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H200 SXM,NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
It was trained on a corpus of about 200,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card able to hold SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B, needing around 33.0 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B.
Answers
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B — common questions
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 41–58 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 33.0 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 49.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 33.0 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— who created it?
It was published by AI Singapore, based in Singapore, an organisation categorised as government.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— when was it released?
It was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation aisingapore. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 8 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H200 SXM,NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 12.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
SEA-LION V3 Llama3.1 70B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.