Llama 3.3 70B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 25.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
48.4 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama 3.3 70B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
48.4
tok/s
41–58 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.7
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.6
tok/s
25–36 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
29.5
tok/s
25–35 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
28.3
tok/s
17–45 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.1
tok/s
22–31 |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.5
tok/s
22–31 |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 33.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.1
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
23.8
tok/s
20–29 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
20.3
tok/s
17–24 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 73.8 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.7
tok/s
16–22 |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 41.2 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
17.9
tok/s
15–22 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 57.5 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 6 December 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Code generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 70B
- Training data
- 15,000,000,000,000 tokens
70B
"Overview: Llama 3.3 was pretrained on ~15 trillion tokens of data from publicly available sources. The fine-tuning data includes publicly available instruction datasets, as well as over 25M synthetically generated examples. Data Freshness: The pretraining data has a cutoff of December 2023."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 6.9 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
6ND = 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 70*10^9 parameters * 15*10^12 tokens = 6.3e+24 FLOP 7000000 GPU-hours * 3600 sec / hour * 989500000000000 FLOP / second * 0.3 [assumed utilization]= 7.48062e+24 FLOP sqrt(7.48062e+24*6.3e+24) = 6.8649768e+24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chip-hours
- 7,000,000
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
License A custom commercial license, the Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement, is available at: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_3/LICENSE "Llama 3.3 is intended for commercial and research use in multiple languages."
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- Training cost
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM)
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama 3.3 70B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 48.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 38.7 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 30.9 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 29.6 tok/s
- 08 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 29.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 28.3 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama 3.3 70B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 33.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 41.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
33.0 GB
Fastest
48.4 tok/s
Llama 3.3 70B sits at 70B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 61 of the cards we track can hold it.
The least hardware that works is a A100 PCIe 40 GB. Its 40 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 25.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 48.4 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
Llama 3.3 70B was published by Meta AI, in United States of America, in December 2024. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Code generation.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
How fast it runs, and why
The median result is around 17.1 tokens per second; 49 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 6.9 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
It was trained on about 15,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is training cost.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama 3.3 70B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Llama 3.3 70B — around 33.0 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Llama 3.3 70B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes Llama 3.3 70B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for Llama 3.3 70B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 48.4 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage Llama 3.3 70B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Llama 3.3 70B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Llama 3.3 70B — common questions
Who created Llama 3.3 70B?
Llama 3.3 70B was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Llama 3.3 70B released?
Llama 3.3 70B was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Llama 3.3 70B used for?
Llama 3.3 70B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Llama 3.3 70B?
The weights for Llama 3.3 70B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Llama 3.3 70B?
Around 6.9 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Llama 3.3 70B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Llama 3.3 70B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 12.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Llama 3.3 70B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 61 of the cards we track already hold Llama 3.3 70B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Llama 3.3 70B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and Llama 3.3 70B appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these Llama 3.3 70B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 41–58 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Llama 3.3 70B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Llama 3.3 70B is the A100 PCIe 40 GB, with 40 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 33.0 GB, and produces roughly 25.5 tokens per second. 61 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Llama 3.3 70B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 48.4 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 49 of the cards that can run Llama 3.3 70B clear that.
How much VRAM does Llama 3.3 70B need?
About 33.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Llama 3.3 70B open source?
Its weights are published, so Llama 3.3 70B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Llama 3.3 70B have?
Llama 3.3 70B has 70B parameters. 70B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.