InternVL2_5-78B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Quadro RTX 8000
48 GB · Q3_K_M · 9.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
43.2 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run InternVL2_5-78B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
58 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.2
tok/s
26–69 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.2
tok/s
26–69 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34.5
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34.5
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.9
tok/s
19–49 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
27.6
tok/s
17–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27.3
tok/s
16–44 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 39.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
26.4
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.4
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.4
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
26.4
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
26.4
tok/s
16–42 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
25.3
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
22.4
tok/s
13–36 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
22.4
tok/s
13–36 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
22.4
tok/s
13–36 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
19.5
tok/s
12–31 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 39.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
19.5
tok/s
12–31 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.3 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
18.2
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
18.2
tok/s
11–29 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 84.6 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
16.0
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
16.0
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
16.0
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
16.0
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
16.0
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 66.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Shanghai AI Lab,SenseTime,Tsinghua University,Nanjing University,Fudan University,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- China, Hong Kong
- Published
- 6 December 2024
- Authors
- Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Yue Cao, Yangzhou Liu, Zhangwei Gao, Erfei Cui, Jinguo Zhu, Shenglong Ye, Hao Tian, Zhaoyang Liu, Lixin Gu, Xuehui Wang, Qingyun Li, Yimin Ren, Zixuan Chen, Jiapeng Luo, Jiahao Wang, Tan Jiang, Bo Wang, Conghui He, Botian Shi, Xingcheng Zhang, Han Lv, Yi Wang, Wenqi Shao, Pei Chu, Zhongying Tu, Tong He, Zhiyong Wu, Huipeng Deng, Jiaye Ge, Kai Chen, Kaipeng Zhang, Limin Wang,…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Multimodal, Language, Vision
- Task
- Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR)
- Base model
- Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B),InternViT-6B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 78.4B
- Training data
- 120,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
78.4B
Stage 1: 76B tokens Stage 2: 44B tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 2.1 × 10²² FLOP
Stage 1: 76B tokens (MLP projector - 172.01M parameters https://internvl.github.io/blog/2024-12-05-InternVL-2.5/) Stage 2: 44B tokens (full model) 6 FLOP / parameter / token * (172.01 * 10^6 parameters * 76 * 10^9 tokens + 78*10^9 parameters * 44*10^9 tokens) = 2.0670437e+22 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- OpenGVLab
qwen license (100M MAU cap) https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/InternVL2_5-78B "This project is released under the MIT License. This project uses the pre-trained Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as a component, which is licensed under the Qwen License." MIT license https://github.com/OpenGVLab/InternVL "Release training / evaluation code for InternVL2.5 series Support liger kernels to save GPU memory" is checked off
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 1,468
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for InternVL2_5-78B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 43.2 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 43.2 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 34.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 34.5 tok/s
- 05 H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB · 3,940 GB/s · Q6_K 30.9 tok/s
- 06 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 27.6 tok/s
- 07 GRID A100B 48 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q3_K_M 27.3 tok/s
- 08 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 26.4 tok/s
- 09 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 26.4 tok/s
- 10 H100 SXM5 94 GB 94 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q6_K 26.4 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run InternVL2_5-78B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.8 tok/s
- 02 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.5 tok/s
- 03 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.6 tok/s
- 04 L20 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.8 tok/s
- 06 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.8 tok/s
- 07 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 11.7 tok/s
- 08 RTX 6000 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.0 tok/s
- 09 L40 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.6 tok/s
- 10 L40S 48 GB · needs 39.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.6 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Quadro RTX 8000
Memory needed
39.0 GB
Fastest
43.2 tok/s
InternVL2_5-78B sits at 78.4B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 58 of the cards we track can hold it.
The entry point is the Quadro RTX 8000: 48 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 9.8 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 43.2 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
InternVL2_5-78B was published by Shanghai AI Lab,SenseTime,Tsinghua University,Nanjing University,Fudan University,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in China, in December 2024. It comes out of academia,Industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia.
It works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, and is recorded as doing visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR).
It builds on Qwen2.5 Instruct (72B),InternViT-6B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the OpenGVLab organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 13.9 tokens per second, and 44 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Training and provenance
It was trained on about 120,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for InternVL2_5-78B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what InternVL2_5-78B actually needs — around 39.0 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for InternVL2_5-78B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes InternVL2_5-78B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for InternVL2_5-78B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 43.2 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage InternVL2_5-78B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for InternVL2_5-78B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
InternVL2_5-78B — common questions
What is InternVL2_5-78B used for?
InternVL2_5-78B works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, and is recorded as handling visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Character recognition (OCR). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download InternVL2_5-78B?
Its weights are published under the OpenGVLab organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run InternVL2_5-78B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 12.1 GB. Our figures for InternVL2_5-78B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run InternVL2_5-78B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 58 of the cards we track already hold InternVL2_5-78B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for InternVL2_5-78B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard InternVL2_5-78B has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these InternVL2_5-78B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 26–69 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run InternVL2_5-78B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds InternVL2_5-78B is the Quadro RTX 8000, with 48 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 39.0 GB, and produces roughly 9.8 tokens per second. 58 cards in total can run it.
How fast is InternVL2_5-78B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 43.2 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 44 of the cards that can run InternVL2_5-78B clear that.
How much VRAM does InternVL2_5-78B need?
About 39.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is InternVL2_5-78B open source?
Its weights are published, so InternVL2_5-78B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does InternVL2_5-78B have?
InternVL2_5-78B has 78.4B parameters. 78.4B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created InternVL2_5-78B?
InternVL2_5-78B was published by Shanghai AI Lab,SenseTime,Tsinghua University,Nanjing University,Fudan University,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shanghai Jiao Tong University, based in China, categorised as academia,Industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia.
When was InternVL2_5-78B released?
InternVL2_5-78B was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.