VAETKI TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Radeon Instinct MI200
64 GB · Q4_K_M · 69.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
188 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run VAETKI?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
43 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
188
tok/s
113–301 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
188
tok/s
113–301 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
150
tok/s
90–241 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
150
tok/s
90–241 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
141
tok/s
85–226 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
141
tok/s
85–226 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 79.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
120
tok/s
72–192 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
115
tok/s
69–184 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
115
tok/s
69–184 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
115
tok/s
69–184 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 79.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
115
tok/s
69–184 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 79.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
115
tok/s
69–184 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 79.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
110
tok/s
66–176 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–176 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 55.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
97.7
tok/s
59–156 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
97.7
tok/s
59–156 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
97.7
tok/s
59–156 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 102.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
85.7
tok/s
51–137 · low confidence |
H800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
81.5
tok/s
49–130 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 67.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NC AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Korea (Republic of)
- Published
- 30 December 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 100B
- Training data
- tokens
- Epochs
- 1
- Batch size
- 8,000
Total parameters: 100B (Sparse), Active parameters: 10B per token. It uses a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 1 shared expert and 128 total experts(top-8 routing)
Multi-stage training strategy: Pre-training Stage 1 (Main): 8000 Pre-training Stages 2-3 / Post Training (Annealing/Refinement): 2000
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Nvidia H100 80G
- Chips used
- 1,016
- Wall-clock time
- 3,238 hours (134.9 days)
Trained on 1,016 H100 GPUs for 4.5 months
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Training cost
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Last updated
- 3 January 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run VAETKI
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 188 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 188 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 150 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 150 tok/s
- 05 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q5_K_M 141 tok/s
- 06 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q5_K_M 141 tok/s
- 07 H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB · 3,940 GB/s · Q6_K 135 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 120 tok/s
- 09 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 115 tok/s
- 10 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 115 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run VAETKI
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Jetson T4000 64 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 14.8 tok/s
- 02 H100 SXM5 64 GB 64 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 110 tok/s
- 03 Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB 64 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.1 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI200 64 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 69.5 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI210 64 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 69.5 tok/s
- 06 RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell 72 GB · needs 55.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 72.8 tok/s
- 07 H100 CNX 80 GB · needs 67.4 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 85.7 tok/s
- 08 H800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 67.4 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 85.7 tok/s
- 09 H800 SXM5 80 GB · needs 67.4 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 141 tok/s
- 10 A800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 67.4 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 81.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Radeon Instinct MI200
Memory needed
55.8 GB
Fastest
188 tok/s
VAETKI reaches a parameter count of 100B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 43.
The entry point is Radeon Instinct MI200, with a memory capacity of 64 GB, running it at a compression of Q4_K_M and producing around 69.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 188 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
VAETKI was published by NC AI, in the country recorded as Korea (Republic of), during December 2025. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
Reading the throughput figures
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 85.7 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 41 of them.
Mixture-of-experts routing is why the speeds here look high for the parameter count. Only a fraction is read per token, but the whole thing has to be loaded.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
It is tracked in the underlying dataset for one reason in particular: training cost.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for VAETKI
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of VAETKI, needing around 55.8 GB at a compression of Q4_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for VAETKI.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for VAETKI. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 188 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of VAETKI. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for VAETKI.
Answers
VAETKI — common questions
VAETKI— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
VAETKI— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 100B. Total parameters: 100B (Sparse), Active parameters: 10B per token. It uses a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 1 shared expert and 128 total experts(top-8 routing). That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
VAETKI— who created it?
It was published by NC AI, based in Korea (Republic of), an organisation categorised as industry.
VAETKI— when was it released?
It was published in December 2025.
VAETKI— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
VAETKI— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
VAETKI— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 12.6 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
VAETKI— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 43. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
VAETKI— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
VAETKI— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 113–301 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
VAETKI— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Radeon Instinct MI200, with a memory capacity of 64 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q4_K_M using about 55.8 GB, and produces roughly 69.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 43.
VAETKI— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 188 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 41.
VAETKI— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 55.8 GB at a compression of Q4_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.