Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · Q3_K_M · 46.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
596 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
596
tok/s
357–953 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
596
tok/s
357–953 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
476
tok/s
285–761 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
476
tok/s
285–761 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
380
tok/s
228–609 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
364
tok/s
218–583 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
364
tok/s
218–583 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
348
tok/s
209–558 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
293
tok/s
176–469 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
138–369 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 18.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
227
tok/s
136–363 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 14.4 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
210
tok/s
126–336 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 18.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
202
tok/s
121–324 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
202
tok/s
121–324 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
194
tok/s
116–310 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
194
tok/s
116–310 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.4 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NVIDIA
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 15 December 2025
- Authors
- Abhinav Khattar, Aleksander Ficek, Alisa Liu, Arham Mehta, Asif Ahamed, Ayush Dattagupta, Benedikt Schifferer, Brandon Norick, Branislav Kisacanin, Dan Su, Dane Corneil, Daria Gitman, Dhruv Nathawani, Dima Rekesh, Divyanshu Kakwani, Edgar Minasyan, Eileen Long, Ellie Evans, Eric Tramel, Evelina Bakhturina, Felipe Soares, Feng Chen, Gantavya Bhatt, George Armstrong, Igor Gitman, Ivan Moshkov, Jane …
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 31.6B
- Training data
- tokens
"Nano 30B-A3B Base contains 31.6B total parameters out of which 3.2B are activ"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP
3.2e9 active parameters * 25e12 tokens * 6 = 4.8e23 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Hugging Face
- nvidia
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Discretionary
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Family of Models
- Last updated
- 8 April 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 476 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 476 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 380 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 348 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 40.1 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 97.5 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 29.3 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 57.9 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 50.5 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 90.0 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 180 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 101 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 101 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
14.4 GB
Fastest
596 tok/s
With 31.6B parameters, Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 241 of the cards we track can run it.
The least hardware that works is a Xeon Phi 7120P. Its 16 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 46.0 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 596 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
Background
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B was published by NVIDIA, in United States of America, in December 2025. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 94.0 tokens per second, and 239 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
Training it took roughly 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is discretionary.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B — around 14.4 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 596 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B — common questions
When was Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B released?
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B was published in December 2025.
What is Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B used for?
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Its weights are published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Around 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 7.3 GB. Our figures for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B only if one card cannot hold it — 241 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B has to be squeezed — 6 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 357–953 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B is the Xeon Phi 7120P, with 16 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 14.4 GB, and produces roughly 46.0 tokens per second. 241 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 596 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 239 of the cards that can run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B clear that.
How much VRAM does Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B need?
About 14.4 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 14.4 GB and generating roughly 227 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 18.1 GB and generating roughly 230 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B open source?
Its weights are published, so Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B have?
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B has 31.6B parameters. "Nano 30B-A3B Base contains 31.6B total parameters out of which 3.2B are activ". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B was published by NVIDIA, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.