Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · Q3_K_M · 46.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
596 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
596
tok/s
357–953 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
596
tok/s
357–953 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
476
tok/s
285–761 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
476
tok/s
285–761 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
380
tok/s
228–609 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
364
tok/s
218–583 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
364
tok/s
218–583 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
348
tok/s
209–558 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
293
tok/s
176–469 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
250
tok/s
150–400 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 32.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
138–369 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 18.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
227
tok/s
136–363 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 14.4 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
210
tok/s
126–336 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 18.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
202
tok/s
121–324 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
202
tok/s
121–324 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
194
tok/s
116–310 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
194
tok/s
116–310 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.4 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NVIDIA
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 15 December 2025
- Authors
- Abhinav Khattar, Aleksander Ficek, Alisa Liu, Arham Mehta, Asif Ahamed, Ayush Dattagupta, Benedikt Schifferer, Brandon Norick, Branislav Kisacanin, Dan Su, Dane Corneil, Daria Gitman, Dhruv Nathawani, Dima Rekesh, Divyanshu Kakwani, Edgar Minasyan, Eileen Long, Ellie Evans, Eric Tramel, Evelina Bakhturina, Felipe Soares, Feng Chen, Gantavya Bhatt, George Armstrong, Igor Gitman, Ivan Moshkov, Jane …
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 31.6B
- Training data
- tokens
"Nano 30B-A3B Base contains 31.6B total parameters out of which 3.2B are activ"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP
3.2e9 active parameters * 25e12 tokens * 6 = 4.8e23 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Hugging Face
- nvidia
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Discretionary
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Family of Models
- Last updated
- 8 April 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 476 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 476 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 380 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 348 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 40.1 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 97.5 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 29.3 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 57.9 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 50.5 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 90.0 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 180 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 101 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 14.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 101 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
14.4 GB
Fastest
596 tok/s
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B reaches a parameter count of 31.6B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
The least hardware that works is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 46.0 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 596 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B was published by NVIDIA, in the country recorded as United States of America, during December 2025. The category the publisher falls under is industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation nvidia.
Reading the throughput figures
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 94.0 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 239 of them.
Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
Training it took a computation budget of roughly 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all: discretionary.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B, needing around 14.4 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 596 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B.
Answers
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B — common questions
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— when was it released?
It was published in December 2025.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation nvidia. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 4.8 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 7.3 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 6. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 357–953 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 14.4 GB, and produces roughly 46.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 596 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 239.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 14.4 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 14.4 GB and generating roughly 227 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q4_K_M, using about 18.1 GB and generating roughly 230 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 31.6B. "Nano 30B-A3B Base contains 31.6B total parameters out of which 3.2B are activ". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Nemotron 3-Nano-30B-A3B— who created it?
It was published by NVIDIA, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.