AntiFormer TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 1,494 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
137,339 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run AntiFormer?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
137,339
tok/s
82,403–219,742 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
137,339
tok/s
82,403–219,742 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109,669
tok/s
65,801–175,470 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109,669
tok/s
65,801–175,470 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
87,708
tok/s
52,625–140,333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83,948
tok/s
50,369–134,318 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83,948
tok/s
50,369–134,318 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
80,343
tok/s
48,206–128,549 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,305
tok/s
42,783–114,088 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,305
tok/s
42,783–114,088 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,305
tok/s
42,783–114,088 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67,639
tok/s
40,584–108,223 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
57,682
tok/s
34,609–92,292 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
57,682
tok/s
34,609–92,292 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
57,682
tok/s
34,609–92,292 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
57,682
tok/s
34,609–92,292 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
57,682
tok/s
34,609–92,292 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,921
tok/s
26,353–70,274 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,921
tok/s
26,353–70,274 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
36,601
tok/s
21,961–58,561 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35,820
tok/s
21,492–57,312 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35,021
tok/s
21,013–56,034 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35,021
tok/s
21,013–56,034 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35,021
tok/s
21,013–56,034 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35,021
tok/s
21,013–56,034 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- University of Florida,Sichuan University,Shihezi University,University of Macau,University of Texas Health Science Center
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- United States of America, China, Macao
- Published
- 20 August 2024
- Authors
- Qing Wang, Yuzhou Feng, Yanfei Wang, Bo Li, Jianguo Wen, Xiaobo Zhou, Qianqian Song
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Biology
- Task
- Protein protein binding affinity prediction
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 24.7M
- Training data
- tokens
- Batch size
- 64
Loaded provided model file from Zenodo page into PyTorch.
"The training batch size is set to 64, the test batch size to 128, and the learning rate is 0.0001. AntiFormer is trained on one NVIDIA A100 TENSOR CORE GPU with 40 GB memory" from Model training paragraph
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.7 × 10¹⁸ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
1. Hardware setup: 1x NVIDIA A100 GPU (3.12x10^14 FLOP/s using FP16 Tensor Core) 2. Training duration: Directly provided - 0.76 hours per epoch x 5 folds = 3.8 hours (13,680 seconds) 3. Utilization rate: 40% 4. Calculation: 3.12x10^14 FLOP/s × 13,680s × 1 GPU × 0.4 = 1.71×10^18 FLOPs
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Chips used
- 1
- Power draw
- 433 W
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
[MIT license] All source codes and trained models in our experiments have been deposited at https://github.com/QSong-github/AntiFormer.
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- AntiFormer: graph enhanced large language model for binding affinity prediction
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run AntiFormer
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 137,339 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 137,339 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 109,669 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 109,669 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 87,708 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 83,948 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 83,948 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 80,343 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 71,305 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 71,305 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run AntiFormer
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,648 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,648 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,197 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 3,296 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 586 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,714 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,928 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,714 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,384 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,428 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
0.7 GB
Fastest
137,339 tok/s
AntiFormer is small enough at 24.7M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q8_0 and producing around 1,494 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 137,339 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
AntiFormer was published by University of Florida,Sichuan University,Shihezi University,University of Macau,University of Texas Health Science Center, in United States of America, in August 2024. academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Biology, and is recorded as doing protein protein binding affinity prediction.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
How fast it runs, and why
The median result is around 3,856.5 tokens per second; 818 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 1.7 × 10¹⁸ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for AntiFormer
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold AntiFormer — around 0.7 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context AntiFormer can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage AntiFormer by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for AntiFormer follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 137,339 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means AntiFormer loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for AntiFormer alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
AntiFormer — common questions
How fast is AntiFormer on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 137,339 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 818 of the cards that can run AntiFormer clear that.
How much VRAM does AntiFormer need?
About 0.7 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run AntiFormer on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 25,579 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run AntiFormer on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 15,664 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run AntiFormer on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 19,399 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run AntiFormer on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 23,004 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is AntiFormer open source?
Its weights are published, so AntiFormer can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does AntiFormer have?
AntiFormer has 24.7M parameters. Loaded provided model file from Zenodo page into PyTorch. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created AntiFormer?
AntiFormer was published by University of Florida,Sichuan University,Shihezi University,University of Macau,University of Texas Health Science Center, based in United States of America, categorised as academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia.
When was AntiFormer released?
AntiFormer was published in August 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is AntiFormer used for?
AntiFormer works in Biology, and is recorded as handling protein protein binding affinity prediction. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download AntiFormer?
The weights for AntiFormer are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train AntiFormer?
Around 1.7 × 10¹⁸ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run AntiFormer if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for AntiFormer assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run AntiFormer faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold AntiFormer on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for AntiFormer?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run AntiFormer, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these AntiFormer speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 82,403–219,742 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run AntiFormer?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds AntiFormer is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 0.7 GB, and produces roughly 1,494 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.