InternLM2.5 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Quadro K6000
12 GB · Q3_K_M · 14.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
169 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run InternLM2.5?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
293 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
169
tok/s
102–271 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
169
tok/s
102–271 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108
tok/s
65–173 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99.1
tok/s
59–159 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–134 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.2
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 12.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
54.2
tok/s
33–87 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54.2
tok/s
33–87 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.1
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 10.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
52.1
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 10.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
46.9
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
45.2
tok/s
27–72 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.2
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Shanghai AI Lab
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 1 August 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 20B
- Training data
- tokens
20b
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Hugging Face
- internlm
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- InternLM2.5-20B Model Card
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for InternLM2.5
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 108 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 104 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 104 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.1 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 88.0 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 88.0 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run InternLM2.5
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Switch 2 GPU 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 5.9 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5070 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.4 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.4 tok/s
- 05 Arc B580 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 7800M 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.8 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Quadro K6000
Memory needed
10.5 GB
Fastest
169 tok/s
With 20B parameters, InternLM2.5 lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 293 of the cards we track can run it.
The smallest card that holds it is the Quadro K6000 with 12 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 14.0 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 169 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
What this model is
InternLM2.5 was published by Shanghai AI Lab, in China, in August 2024. academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. It is published under the internlm organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 20.6 tokens per second, and 248 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for InternLM2.5
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold InternLM2.5 — around 10.5 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason InternLM2.5 stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage InternLM2.5 by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for InternLM2.5 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 169 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs InternLM2.5 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for InternLM2.5 alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
InternLM2.5 — common questions
Can I run InternLM2.5 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 17.5 GB and generating roughly 41.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is InternLM2.5 open source?
Its weights are published, so InternLM2.5 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does InternLM2.5 have?
InternLM2.5 has 20B parameters. 20b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created InternLM2.5?
InternLM2.5 was published by Shanghai AI Lab, based in China, categorised as academia.
When was InternLM2.5 released?
InternLM2.5 was published in August 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is InternLM2.5 used for?
InternLM2.5 works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download InternLM2.5?
Its weights are published under the internlm organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run InternLM2.5 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.9 GB. Our figures for InternLM2.5 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run InternLM2.5 faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 293 of the cards we track already hold InternLM2.5 on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for InternLM2.5?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and InternLM2.5 appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these InternLM2.5 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 102–271 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run InternLM2.5?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds InternLM2.5 is the Quadro K6000, with 12 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 10.5 GB, and produces roughly 14.0 tokens per second. 293 cards in total can run it.
How fast is InternLM2.5 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 169 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 248 of the cards that can run InternLM2.5 clear that.
How much VRAM does InternLM2.5 need?
About 10.5 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run InternLM2.5 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 10.5 GB and generating roughly 52.1 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run InternLM2.5 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a tight fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.