PaliGemma TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q6_K · 17.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,129 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run PaliGemma?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,129
tok/s
678–1,807 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,129
tok/s
678–1,807 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
902
tok/s
541–1,443 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
902
tok/s
541–1,443 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
721
tok/s
433–1,154 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
690
tok/s
414–1,105 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
690
tok/s
414–1,105 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
396–1,057 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
586
tok/s
352–938 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
586
tok/s
352–938 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
586
tok/s
352–938 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
556
tok/s
334–890 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
474
tok/s
285–759 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
474
tok/s
285–759 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
474
tok/s
285–759 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
474
tok/s
285–759 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
474
tok/s
285–759 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
361
tok/s
217–578 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
361
tok/s
217–578 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
301
tok/s
181–482 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
295
tok/s
177–471 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
288
tok/s
173–461 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
288
tok/s
173–461 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
288
tok/s
173–461 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
288
tok/s
173–461 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 10 July 2024
- Authors
- Lucas Beyer, Andreas Steiner, André Susano Pinto, Alexander Kolesnikov, Xiao Wang, Daniel Salz, Maxim Neumann, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Michael Tschannen, Emanuele Bugliarello, Thomas Unterthiner, Daniel Keysers, Skanda Koppula, Fangyu Liu, Adam Grycner, Alexey Gritsenko, Neil Houlsby, Manoj Kumar, Keran Rong, Julian Eisenschlos, Rishabh Kabra, Matthias Bauer, Matko Bošnjak, Xi Chen, Matthias Minder…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Visual question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 3B
- Training data
- tokens
Model Components: Vision Encoder: SigLIP-So400m, a 400M parameter model pretrained with a contrastive objective. Language Model: Gemma-2B, a 2B parameter decoder-only model from the Gemma family of LLMs.
"We train Stage1 at resolution 224px (hence, 𝑁img = 256 image tokens) and sequence length 𝑁txt = 128 for a total of 1 billion examples." "For resolution 448, we train for an additional 50 M examples, and for resolution 896, we add another 10 M examples. <..> we also increase the text sequence length to 𝑁txt = 512 tokens." "Stage1 sees slightly less than 350 B tokens, and both Stage2 combined about 90 B tokens." 5189 tokens/second/device (reported) * 102*3600*256 = 487782604800 tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.1 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
197000000000000 FLOP/s *256 GPUs *102 hours *3600 s / hour *0.55 [reported utilization] + 123000000000000 FLOP/s *32 GPUs *60 hours [for transfer] *3600 s / hour *0.55 [reported utilization]= 1.0652844e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v5e,Google TPU v3
- Chips used
- 256
- Wall-clock time
- 162 hours
- Hardware utilisation
- MFU 55.0%
"One training run of the final PaliGemma model using TPUv5e-256 takes slightly less than 3 days for Stage1 and 15h for each Stage2. Stage1 sees slightly less than 350 B tokens, and both Stage2 combined about 90 B tokens. Transfers take between 20min and 10h on TPUv3-32, depending on the task" "we transfer the pretrained models on more than 30 academic benchmarks via fine-tuning" 3*24+15*2 = 102 (stage 1 and stage 2 without transfers) assuming(!) 2 hours on average for transfer, 2*30 = 60 hours
"We measured a model FLOPS utilization (MFU) of 55%, resulting in 5189 tokens/second/device."
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/paligemma
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run PaliGemma
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,129 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,129 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 902 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 902 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 721 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 690 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 690 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 661 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 586 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 586 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run PaliGemma
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 19.7 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 19.7 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 26.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 39.4 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 7.0 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 20.5 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 20.5 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 16.5 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q6_K · tight 17.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.2 GB
Fastest
1,129 tok/s
PaliGemma reaches a parameter count of 3B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.
The entry point is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q6_K and producing around 17.9 tokens per second.
The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 1,129 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Where it came from
PaliGemma was published by Google DeepMind, in the country recorded as United States of America, during July 2024. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as performing the task of visual question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Understanding the speeds
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 35.8 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 780 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 1.1 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as Google TPU v5e,Google TPU v3. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for PaliGemma
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of PaliGemma, needing around 3.2 GB at a compression of Q6_K. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by PaliGemma.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q6_K on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for PaliGemma. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 1,129 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of PaliGemma. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond PaliGemma.
Answers
PaliGemma — common questions
PaliGemma— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q6_K using about 3.2 GB, and produces roughly 17.9 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.
PaliGemma— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 1,129 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 780.
PaliGemma— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 3.2 GB at a compression of Q6_K, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
PaliGemma— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 3.9 GB and generating roughly 210 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
PaliGemma— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 3.9 GB and generating roughly 129 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
PaliGemma— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 3.9 GB and generating roughly 160 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
PaliGemma— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 3.9 GB and generating roughly 189 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
PaliGemma— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
PaliGemma— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 3B. Model Components: Vision Encoder: SigLIP-So400m, a 400M parameter model pretrained with a contrastive objective. Language Model: Gemma-2B, a 2B parameter decoder-only model from the Gemma family of LLMs. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
PaliGemma— who created it?
It was published by Google DeepMind, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
PaliGemma— when was it released?
It was published in July 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
PaliGemma— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as handling the task of visual question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
PaliGemma— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
PaliGemma— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 1.1 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as Google TPU v5e,Google TPU v3. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
PaliGemma— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
PaliGemma— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
PaliGemma— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 2. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
PaliGemma— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 678–1,807 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.