Qwen2-0.5B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 73.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
6,776 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen2-0.5B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
6,776
tok/s
4,066–10,842 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,776
tok/s
4,066–10,842 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,411
tok/s
3,247–8,658 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,411
tok/s
3,247–8,658 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,328
tok/s
2,597–6,924 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,142
tok/s
2,485–6,627 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,142
tok/s
2,485–6,627 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,964
tok/s
2,379–6,343 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,518
tok/s
2,111–5,629 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,518
tok/s
2,111–5,629 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,518
tok/s
2,111–5,629 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,337
tok/s
2,002–5,340 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,846
tok/s
1,708–4,554 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,846
tok/s
1,708–4,554 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,846
tok/s
1,708–4,554 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,846
tok/s
1,708–4,554 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,846
tok/s
1,708–4,554 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,167
tok/s
1,300–3,467 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,167
tok/s
1,300–3,467 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,806
tok/s
1,084–2,889 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,767
tok/s
1,060–2,828 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,728
tok/s
1,037–2,765 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,728
tok/s
1,037–2,765 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,728
tok/s
1,037–2,765 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,728
tok/s
1,037–2,765 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 7 June 2024
- Authors
- An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jianxin Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Chen, Kexin Yang, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Na Ni, Pei Zhang, Peng W…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 500M
- Training data
- 12,000,000,000,000 tokens
Table 1
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.6 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6 FLOP/parameter/token * 500000000 parameters * 12000000000000 tokens = 3.6e+22 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
Apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hello Qwen2
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen2-0.5B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 6,776 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 6,776 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 5,411 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 5,411 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 4,328 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 4,142 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 4,142 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,964 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 3,518 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 3,518 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen2-0.5B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 81.3 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 81.3 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 108 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 163 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 28.9 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 84.6 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 95.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 84.6 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 68.3 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 70.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.2 GB
Fastest
6,776 tok/s
Qwen2-0.5B is small enough at 500M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q8_0 and producing around 73.7 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 6,776 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
Qwen2-0.5B was published by Alibaba, in China, in June 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. It is published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
The median result is around 190.3 tokens per second; 816 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 3.6 × 10²² FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 12,000,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen2-0.5B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against Qwen2-0.5B — around 1.2 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Qwen2-0.5B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Qwen2-0.5B — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second for Qwen2-0.5B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 6,776 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Qwen2-0.5B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Qwen2-0.5B is settled.
Answers
Qwen2-0.5B — common questions
How much VRAM does Qwen2-0.5B need?
About 1.2 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Qwen2-0.5B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 1,262 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Qwen2-0.5B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 773 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Qwen2-0.5B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 957 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Qwen2-0.5B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 1,135 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Qwen2-0.5B open source?
Its weights are published, so Qwen2-0.5B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Qwen2-0.5B have?
Qwen2-0.5B has 500M parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Qwen2-0.5B?
Qwen2-0.5B was published by Alibaba, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Qwen2-0.5B released?
Qwen2-0.5B was published in June 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Qwen2-0.5B used for?
Qwen2-0.5B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Qwen2-0.5B?
Its weights are published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Qwen2-0.5B?
Around 3.6 × 10²² FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Qwen2-0.5B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Qwen2-0.5B is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Qwen2-0.5B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Qwen2-0.5B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Qwen2-0.5B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Qwen2-0.5B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Qwen2-0.5B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 4,066–10,842 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Qwen2-0.5B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Qwen2-0.5B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.2 GB, and produces roughly 73.7 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Qwen2-0.5B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 6,776 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 816 of the cards that can run Qwen2-0.5B clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.