LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · Q4_K_M · 10.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
158 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
61–162 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.8
tok/s
58–155 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.8
tok/s
58–155 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
92.6
tok/s
56–148 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
82.2
tok/s
49–132 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
82.2
tok/s
49–132 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
82.2
tok/s
49–132 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
78.0
tok/s
47–125 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.6
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
50.6
tok/s
30–81 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
50.6
tok/s
30–81 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.9
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
42.2
tok/s
25–68 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.3
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 23.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.0
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Mar 2018 | 13.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
41.0
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- SaltLux
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Korea (Republic of)
- Published
- 27 May 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Base model
- InternLM2-20B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 21.4B
- Training data
- tokens
21.4B
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- saltlux
apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/saltlux/luxia-21.4b-alignment-v1.2
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 158 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 158 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 101 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 96.8 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 96.8 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 92.6 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 82.2 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 82.2 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 22.2 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 6.7 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 13.2 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 4.6 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.5 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 20.5 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 40.9 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.6 GB
Fastest
158 tok/s
With 21.4B parameters, LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 241 of the cards we track can run it.
At the low end, a Xeon Phi 7120P handles it — 16 GB, at Q4_K_M, for about 10.5 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 158 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment was published by SaltLux, in Korea (Republic of), in May 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
It is derived from InternLM2-20B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the saltlux organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
The median result is around 20.5 tokens per second; 195 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Look at what LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment actually needs — around 13.6 GB at Q4_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 158 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment.
Answers
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment — common questions
What is LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment used for?
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment?
Its weights are published under the saltlux organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.8 GB. Our figures for LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment only if one card cannot hold it — 241 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 95–253 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment is the Xeon Phi 7120P, with 16 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 13.6 GB, and produces roughly 10.5 tokens per second. 241 cards in total can run it.
How fast is LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 158 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 195 of the cards that can run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment clear that.
How much VRAM does LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment need?
About 13.6 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 13.6 GB and generating roughly 51.6 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 18.6 GB and generating roughly 38.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment open source?
Its weights are published, so LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment have?
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment has 21.4B parameters. 21.4B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment?
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment was published by SaltLux, based in Korea (Republic of), categorised as industry.
When was LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment released?
LUXIA-21.4B-Alignment was published in May 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.