Mixtral 8x22B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
A100 SXM4 80 GB
80 GB · Q3_K_M · 59.8 tok/s
Fastest card
H100 NVL 94 GB
105 tok/s · 94 GB
Which GPUs can run Mixtral 8x22B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
37 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
105
tok/s
63–168 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.8 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
99.1
tok/s
59–159 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 101.5 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
98.5
tok/s
59–158 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
98.5
tok/s
59–158 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
89.6
tok/s
54–143 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 76.8 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
86.9
tok/s
52–139 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 150.7 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
86.9
tok/s
52–139 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 150.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.2
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 85.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
84.2
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 85.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
80.6
tok/s
48–129 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 101.5 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
77.2
tok/s
46–123 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 117.9 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
77.2
tok/s
46–123 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 117.9 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
69.4
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 150.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
69.4
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 150.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
59.8
tok/s
36–96 · low confidence |
H800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
56.9
tok/s
34–91 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
56.9
tok/s
34–91 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 68.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
50.8
tok/s
30–81 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 150.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49.6
tok/s
30–79 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 101.5 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
49.6
tok/s
30–79 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 101.5 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Mistral AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- France
- Published
- 17 April 2024
- Authors
- Albert Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Alexis Tacnet, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Audrey Herblin-Stoop, Baptiste Bout, Baudouin de Monicault,Blanche Savary, Bam4d, Caroline Feldman, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Eleonore Arcelin, Emma Bou Hanna, Etienne Metzger, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Bour, Guillaume Lample, Harizo Rajaona, Jean-Malo Delignon, Jia Li, Justus Murke, Louis Martin, L…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Code generation, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Question answering
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 141B
- Training data
- tokens
141B params, 39B active: https://mistral.ai/news/mixtral-8x22b/
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
Assuming the model was trained on ~1-10 trillions of tokens (same OOM as the models from the comparison in Figure 1. Llama 2 was trained on 2T tokens) + Mistral Small 3 was trained on 8T of tokens, we can estimate training compute with "speculative" confidence: 6 FLOP / token / parameter * 39 * 10^9 active parameters * 10*10^12 tokens [speculatively] = 2.34e+24 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- mistralai
Apache 2.0 license
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Speculative
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Mixtral 8x22B
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Mixtral 8x22B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB · 3,940 GB/s · IQ4_XS 105 tok/s
- 02 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q5_K_M 99.1 tok/s
- 03 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q3_K_M 98.5 tok/s
- 04 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q3_K_M 98.5 tok/s
- 05 H100 SXM5 94 GB 94 GB · 3,360 GB/s · IQ4_XS 89.6 tok/s
- 06 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 86.9 tok/s
- 07 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 86.9 tok/s
- 08 H100 PCIe 96 GB 96 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q4_K_M 84.2 tok/s
- 09 H100 SXM5 96 GB 96 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q4_K_M 84.2 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 80.6 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Mixtral 8x22B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 H100 CNX 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
- 02 H800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
- 03 H800 SXM5 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 98.5 tok/s
- 04 A800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 56.9 tok/s
- 05 H100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
- 06 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 98.5 tok/s
- 07 A800 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
- 08 A100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 56.9 tok/s
- 09 A100X 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
- 10 A100 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB · needs 68.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
A100 SXM4 80 GB
Memory needed
68.6 GB
Fastest
105 tok/s
Mixtral 8x22B sits at 141B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 37 of the cards we track can hold it.
The smallest card that holds it is the A100 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 59.8 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the H100 NVL 94 GB, at roughly 105 tokens per second thanks to 3,940 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
Mixtral 8x22B was published by Mistral AI, in France, in April 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Code generation, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. It is published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 59.8 tokens per second, and 35 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
How it was trained
The training run consumed about 2.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Mixtral 8x22B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Mixtral 8x22B — around 68.6 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Mixtral 8x22B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes Mixtral 8x22B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Mixtral 8x22B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the H100 NVL 94 GB tops it at 105 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
Tight means Mixtral 8x22B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Mixtral 8x22B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Mixtral 8x22B — common questions
Where can I download Mixtral 8x22B?
Its weights are published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Mixtral 8x22B?
Around 2.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Mixtral 8x22B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Mixtral 8x22B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 20.2 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Mixtral 8x22B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 37 cards already able to run Mixtral 8x22B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Mixtral 8x22B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and Mixtral 8x22B appears at 6 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these Mixtral 8x22B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 63–168 tok/s on the H100 NVL 94 GB rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Mixtral 8x22B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Mixtral 8x22B is the A100 SXM4 80 GB, with 80 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 68.6 GB, and produces roughly 59.8 tokens per second. 37 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Mixtral 8x22B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a H100 NVL 94 GB at about 105 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 35 of the cards that can run Mixtral 8x22B clear that.
How much VRAM does Mixtral 8x22B need?
About 68.6 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Mixtral 8x22B open source?
Its weights are published, so Mixtral 8x22B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Mixtral 8x22B have?
Mixtral 8x22B has 141B parameters. 141B params, 39B active: https://mistral.ai/news/mixtral-8x22b/. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Mixtral 8x22B?
Mixtral 8x22B was published by Mistral AI, based in France, categorised as industry.
When was Mixtral 8x22B released?
Mixtral 8x22B was published in April 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Mixtral 8x22B used for?
Mixtral 8x22B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Code generation, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.