CARP TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 57.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
5,269 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run CARP?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5,269
tok/s
3,162–8,431 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,269
tok/s
3,162–8,431 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,208
tok/s
2,525–6,732 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,208
tok/s
2,525–6,732 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,365
tok/s
2,019–5,384 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,221
tok/s
1,933–5,153 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,221
tok/s
1,933–5,153 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,083
tok/s
1,850–4,932 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,736
tok/s
1,641–4,377 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,736
tok/s
1,641–4,377 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,736
tok/s
1,641–4,377 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,595
tok/s
1,557–4,152 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,213
tok/s
1,328–3,541 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,213
tok/s
1,328–3,541 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,213
tok/s
1,328–3,541 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,213
tok/s
1,328–3,541 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,213
tok/s
1,328–3,541 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,685
tok/s
1,011–2,696 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,685
tok/s
1,011–2,696 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,404
tok/s
843–2,247 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,374
tok/s
825–2,199 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,344
tok/s
806–2,150 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,344
tok/s
806–2,150 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,344
tok/s
806–2,150 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,344
tok/s
806–2,150 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Microsoft Research
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 6 February 2024
- Authors
- Kevin K. Yang, Nicolo Fusi, Alex X. Lu
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Biology
- Task
- Protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM)
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 643M
- Training data
- 1,867,500,000 tokens
643M from Table S1
Total Datapoints = 41.5 × 10^6 × 500 = 2.075 × 10^10 ≈ 2.1 × 10^10 tokens where: - Number of sequences: 41.5 million - Average sequence length: 500 residues 11000 tokens per GPU per batch 620,000 updates
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
1. Hardware setup: 128 NVIDIA V100 GPUs (1.25e14 FLOP/s per GPU) 2. Training duration: 56 days (directly provided) - Converted to seconds: 56 × 24 × 3600 = 4.8384e6 seconds 3. Utilization rate: 40% 4. Final calculation: 1.25e14 FLOP/s × 128 GPUs × 4.8384e6 seconds × 0.4 = 3.1e22 FLOPs 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 640 *10^6 parameters * 11000 tokens per GPU per batch * 128 GPUs * 620000 updates = 3.3521664e+21 FLOP sqrt(3.1e22*3.3521664e+21) = 1.0193977e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA V100
- Chips used
- 128
- Power draw
- 76.0 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
https://github.com/microsoft/protein-sequence-models?tab=readme-ov-file
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 138
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Convolutions are competitive with transformers for protein sequence pretraining
- Last updated
- 1 January 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run CARP
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 5,269 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 5,269 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 4,208 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 4,208 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 3,365 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 3,221 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 3,221 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,083 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 2,736 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 2,736 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run CARP
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 63.2 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 63.2 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 84.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 126 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 22.5 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 65.8 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 74.0 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 65.8 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 53.1 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 54.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.4 GB
Fastest
5,269 tok/s
CARP is small enough at 643M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla C1080: 4 GB of memory, Q8_0 compression, roughly 57.3 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 5,269 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
What this model is
CARP was published by Microsoft Research, in United States of America, in February 2024. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Biology, and is recorded as doing protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM).
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 148.0 tokens per second, and 809 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 1 × 10²² FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA V100 — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 1,867,500,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for CARP
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against CARP — around 1.4 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context CARP can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes CARP fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for CARP. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 5,269 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs CARP but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond CARP.
Answers
CARP — common questions
When was CARP released?
CARP was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is CARP used for?
CARP works in Biology, and is recorded as handling protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download CARP?
The weights for CARP are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train CARP?
Around 1 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA V100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run CARP if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for CARP assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run CARP faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for CARP only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for CARP?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard CARP has to be squeezed — 1 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these CARP speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 3,162–8,431 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run CARP?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds CARP is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.4 GB, and produces roughly 57.3 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is CARP on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 5,269 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 809 of the cards that can run CARP clear that.
How much VRAM does CARP need?
About 1.4 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run CARP on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 981 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CARP on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 601 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CARP on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 744 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CARP on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 883 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is CARP open source?
Its weights are published, so CARP can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does CARP have?
CARP has 643M parameters. 643M from Table S1. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created CARP?
CARP was published by Microsoft Research, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.