Qwen1.5-14B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · IQ4_XS · 17.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
242 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen1.5-14B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242
tok/s
206–290 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
206–290 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–247 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
126–178 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
126–178 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–143 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.9
tok/s
71–101 |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.3
tok/s
61–86 |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Mar 2018 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti NVIDIA | 16 GB | 896 GB/s | Feb 2025 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 4 February 2024
- Authors
- Qwen Team
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 14B
- Training data
- tokens
14B
4 trillion tokens from this response https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen2/issues/97
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.4 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 14*10^9 parameters * 4*10^12 tokens = 3.36e+23 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen1.5-14B
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Introducing Qwen1.5
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen1.5-14B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 155 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 142 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen1.5-14B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 14.8 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 36.1 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.8 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 21.4 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 7.4 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.3 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 66.6 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.7 GB
Fastest
242 tok/s
Qwen1.5-14B reaches a parameter count of 14B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
At the low end it is handled by Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 17.0 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 242 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Qwen1.5-14B was published by Alibaba, in the country recorded as China, during February 2024. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation Qwen.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 28.5 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 220 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 3.4 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen1.5-14B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of Qwen1.5-14B, needing around 13.7 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Qwen1.5-14B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Qwen1.5-14B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 242 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Qwen1.5-14B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Qwen1.5-14B.
Answers
Qwen1.5-14B — common questions
Qwen1.5-14B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation Qwen. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Qwen1.5-14B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 3.4 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Qwen1.5-14B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 3.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Qwen1.5-14B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Qwen1.5-14B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 3. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Qwen1.5-14B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 206–290 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Qwen1.5-14B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 13.7 GB, and produces roughly 17.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Qwen1.5-14B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 242 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 220.
Qwen1.5-14B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 13.7 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Qwen1.5-14B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of IQ4_XS, using about 13.7 GB and generating roughly 83.9 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Qwen1.5-14B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 21.1 GB and generating roughly 40.5 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Qwen1.5-14B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Qwen1.5-14B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 14B. 14B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Qwen1.5-14B— who created it?
It was published by Alibaba, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry.
Qwen1.5-14B— when was it released?
It was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Qwen1.5-14B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.