Stable Code 3B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q6_K · 19.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,212 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Stable Code 3B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,212
tok/s
727–1,939 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,212
tok/s
727–1,939 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
968
tok/s
581–1,548 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
968
tok/s
581–1,548 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
774
tok/s
464–1,238 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
741
tok/s
444–1,185 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
741
tok/s
444–1,185 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
709
tok/s
425–1,134 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
629
tok/s
377–1,007 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
629
tok/s
377–1,007 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
629
tok/s
377–1,007 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
597
tok/s
358–955 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
509
tok/s
305–814 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
509
tok/s
305–814 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
509
tok/s
305–814 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
509
tok/s
305–814 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
509
tok/s
305–814 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–620 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–620 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
323
tok/s
194–517 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
316
tok/s
190–506 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Stability AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Published
- 9 January 2024
- Authors
- Pinnaparaju, Nikhil and Adithyan, Reshinth and Phung, Duy and Tow, Jonathan and Baicoianu, James and and Cooper, Nathan
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Code generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 2.8B
- Training data
- tokens
2796431360 from https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-code-3b#model-architecture "stable-code-3b is a 2.7B billion parameter decoder-only language model pre-trained on 1.3 trillion tokens of diverse textual and code datasets. "
1.3T tokens "stable-code-3b is a 2.7B billion parameter decoder-only language model pre-trained on 1.3 trillion tokens of diverse textual and code datasets. "
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.1 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6ND = 2.7e9 * 1.3e12 * 6 = 2,106E+22 "stable-code-3b is a 2.7B billion parameter decoder-only language model pre-trained on 1.3 trillion tokens of diverse textual and code datasets. "
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Chips used
- 256
- Power draw
- 202.9 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Stable Code 3B
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Stable Code 3B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,212 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,212 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 968 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 968 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 774 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 741 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 741 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 709 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 629 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 629 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Stable Code 3B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 28.2 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 42.3 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 7.5 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 22.0 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 24.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 22.0 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 17.7 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 18.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.0 GB
Fastest
1,212 tok/s
Stable Code 3B is small enough at 2.8B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q6_K and producing around 19.2 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 1,212 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
Stable Code 3B was published by Stability AI, in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, in January 2024. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Code generation.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 38.5 tokens per second, and 784 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
How it was trained
The training run consumed about 2.1 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Stable Code 3B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Stable Code 3B — around 3.0 GB at Q6_K. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Stable Code 3B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q6_K on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Stable Code 3B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Stable Code 3B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 1,212 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage Stable Code 3B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Stable Code 3B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Stable Code 3B — common questions
Where can I download Stable Code 3B?
The weights for Stable Code 3B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Stable Code 3B?
Around 2.1 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Stable Code 3B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Stable Code 3B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Stable Code 3B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Stable Code 3B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Stable Code 3B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Stable Code 3B has to be squeezed — 2 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Stable Code 3B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 727–1,939 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Stable Code 3B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Stable Code 3B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q6_K using about 3.0 GB, and produces roughly 19.2 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Stable Code 3B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 1,212 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 784 of the cards that can run Stable Code 3B clear that.
How much VRAM does Stable Code 3B need?
About 3.0 GB at Q6_K compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Stable Code 3B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 226 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Stable Code 3B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 138 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Stable Code 3B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 171 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Stable Code 3B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 203 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Stable Code 3B open source?
Its weights are published, so Stable Code 3B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Stable Code 3B have?
Stable Code 3B has 2.8B parameters. 2796431360 from https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-code-3b#model-architecture "stable-code-3b is a 2.7B billion parameter decoder-only language model pre-trained on 1.3 trillion tokens of diverse textual and code datasets. ". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Stable Code 3B?
Stable Code 3B was published by Stability AI, based in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, categorised as industry.
When was Stable Code 3B released?
Stable Code 3B was published in January 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Stable Code 3B used for?
Stable Code 3B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.