Mamba-2.8B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q6_K · 19.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,210 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Mamba-2.8B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,210
tok/s
726–1,936 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,210
tok/s
726–1,936 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
966
tok/s
580–1,546 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
966
tok/s
580–1,546 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
773
tok/s
464–1,236 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
740
tok/s
444–1,183 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
740
tok/s
444–1,183 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
708
tok/s
425–1,133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
628
tok/s
377–1,005 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
628
tok/s
377–1,005 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
628
tok/s
377–1,005 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
596
tok/s
358–954 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–619 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–619 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
322
tok/s
193–516 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
316
tok/s
189–505 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Carnegie Mellon University (CMU),Princeton University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 1 December 2023
- Authors
- Albert Gu, Tri Dao
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 2.8B
- Training data
- 300,000,000,000 tokens
2.8B https://github.com/state-spaces/mamba
300B tokens of text "We compare against the most well-known open source models at these sizes, most importantly Pythia (Biderman et al. 2023) and RWKV (B. Peng et al. 2023) which were trained with the same tokenizer, dataset, and training length (300B tokens) as our models."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 5.4 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
"Table 3 shows the performance of Mamba on a range of popular downstream zero-shot evaluation tasks. We compare against the most well-known open source models at these sizes, most importantly Pythia (Biderman et al. 2023) and RWKV (B. Peng et al. 2023) which were trained with the same tokenizer, dataset, and training length (300B tokens) as our models." 3b * 300b * 6 = 5.4e21 Note: this is a new architecture so not sure how well 6*params*data works as a heuristic Figure 4 shows perplexity cur…
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
Apache 2.0 for model. inference/model code: https://github.com/state-spaces/mamba https://huggingface.co/state-spaces/mamba-2.8b
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Likely
- Citations
- 7,063
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Mamba-2.8B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,210 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,210 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 966 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 966 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 773 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 740 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 740 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 708 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 628 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 628 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Mamba-2.8B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 28.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 42.2 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 7.5 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.9 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 24.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.9 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 17.7 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.0 GB · Q6_K · tight 18.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.0 GB
Fastest
1,210 tok/s
Mamba-2.8B is small enough at 2.8B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q6_K, for about 19.1 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 1,210 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Mamba-2.8B was published by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU),Princeton University, in United States of America, in December 2023. academia,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language generation, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 38.4 tokens per second, and 784 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
How it was trained
Training it took roughly 5.4 × 10²¹ FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 300,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Mamba-2.8B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Mamba-2.8B — around 3.0 GB at Q6_K. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Mamba-2.8B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q6_K on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Mamba-2.8B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for Mamba-2.8B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 1,210 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs Mamba-2.8B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Mamba-2.8B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Mamba-2.8B — common questions
How many parameters does Mamba-2.8B have?
Mamba-2.8B has 2.8B parameters. 2.8B https://github.com/state-spaces/mamba. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Mamba-2.8B?
Mamba-2.8B was published by Carnegie Mellon University (CMU),Princeton University, based in United States of America, categorised as academia,Academia.
When was Mamba-2.8B released?
Mamba-2.8B was published in December 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Mamba-2.8B used for?
Mamba-2.8B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Mamba-2.8B?
The weights for Mamba-2.8B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Mamba-2.8B?
Around 5.4 × 10²¹ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Mamba-2.8B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Mamba-2.8B is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Mamba-2.8B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Mamba-2.8B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Mamba-2.8B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and Mamba-2.8B appears at 2 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these Mamba-2.8B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 726–1,936 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Mamba-2.8B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Mamba-2.8B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q6_K using about 3.0 GB, and produces roughly 19.1 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Mamba-2.8B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 1,210 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 784 of the cards that can run Mamba-2.8B clear that.
How much VRAM does Mamba-2.8B need?
About 3.0 GB at Q6_K compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Mamba-2.8B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 225 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Mamba-2.8B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 138 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Mamba-2.8B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 171 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Mamba-2.8B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.7 GB and generating roughly 203 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Mamba-2.8B open source?
Its weights are published, so Mamba-2.8B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.