Qwen-14B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · IQ4_XS · 17.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
242 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen-14B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242
tok/s
206–290 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
206–290 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–247 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
126–178 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
126–178 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–143 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
86–122 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.9
tok/s
71–101 |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 21.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.3
tok/s
61–86 |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Mar 2018 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
66.6
tok/s
57–80 |
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti NVIDIA | 16 GB | 896 GB/s | Feb 2025 | 13.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 28 September 2023
- Authors
- Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Luo Ji, Mei Li, Junyang Lin, Runji Lin, Dayiheng Liu, Gao Liu, Chengqiang Lu, Keming Lu, Jianxin Ma, Rui Men, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Chuanqi Tan, Sinan Tan, Jianhong Tu, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Wei Wang, Shengguang Wu, Benfeng Xu, Jin Xu, An Yang, Hao Yang, Jian Yang, Sh…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 14B
- Training data
- 3,000,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
- Batch size
- 4,000,000
14B
"We have pretrained the language models, namely QWEN, on massive datasets containing trillions of tokens" Table 1 indicates 3T tokens for Qwen-14B, and the above quote suggests the 3T aren't from multiple epochs on a smaller dataset.
Table 1
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.5 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
3T tokens per Table 1 14B*3T*6 = 2.5e23
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
commercial allowed, can't use to train models https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen/blob/main/Tongyi%20Qianwen%20LICENSE%20AGREEMENT
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 3,775
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Qwen Technical Report
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen-14B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 155 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 142 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen-14B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 14.8 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 36.1 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.8 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 21.4 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 7.4 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.7 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.3 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 66.6 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.7 GB
Fastest
242 tok/s
Qwen-14B reaches a parameter count of 14B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
The least hardware that works is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 17.0 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 242 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
Qwen-14B was published by Alibaba, in the country recorded as China, during September 2023. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 28.5 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 220 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 2.5 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
It was trained on a corpus of about 3,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen-14B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Qwen-14B, needing around 13.7 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Qwen-14B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Qwen-14B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 242 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of Qwen-14B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Qwen-14B.
Answers
Qwen-14B — common questions
Qwen-14B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 13.7 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Qwen-14B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of IQ4_XS, using about 13.7 GB and generating roughly 83.9 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Qwen-14B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 21.1 GB and generating roughly 40.5 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Qwen-14B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Qwen-14B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 14B. 14B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Qwen-14B— who created it?
It was published by Alibaba, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry.
Qwen-14B— when was it released?
It was published in September 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Qwen-14B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Qwen-14B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Qwen-14B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 2.5 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Qwen-14B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 3.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Qwen-14B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Qwen-14B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 3. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Qwen-14B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 206–290 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Qwen-14B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 13.7 GB, and produces roughly 17.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Qwen-14B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 242 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 220.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.