DeciCoder-1B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 33.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
3,080 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run DeciCoder-1B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3,080
tok/s
1,848–4,928 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,080
tok/s
1,848–4,928 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,460
tok/s
1,476–3,935 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,460
tok/s
1,476–3,935 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,967
tok/s
1,180–3,147 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,883
tok/s
1,130–3,012 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,883
tok/s
1,130–3,012 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,802
tok/s
1,081–2,883 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,599
tok/s
960–2,559 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,599
tok/s
960–2,559 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,599
tok/s
960–2,559 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,517
tok/s
910–2,427 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,294
tok/s
776–2,070 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,294
tok/s
776–2,070 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,294
tok/s
776–2,070 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,294
tok/s
776–2,070 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,294
tok/s
776–2,070 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
985
tok/s
591–1,576 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
985
tok/s
591–1,576 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
821
tok/s
493–1,313 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
803
tok/s
482–1,285 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
785
tok/s
471–1,257 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
785
tok/s
471–1,257 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
785
tok/s
471–1,257 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
785
tok/s
471–1,257 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Deci AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Israel
- Published
- 15 August 2023
- Authors
- DeciAI Research Team
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Code generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.1B
- Training data
- 446,000,000,000 tokens
1.1B, per model card https://huggingface.co/Deci/DeciCoder-1b
Total Tokens: 446B
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.9 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
446b * 1.1b * 6 = 2.9e21
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
Apache 2.0 data is StarCoder, license unclear
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Model Card for DeciCoder-1b
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for DeciCoder-1B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,080 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,080 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,460 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,460 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,967 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,883 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,883 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,802 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,599 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,599 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run DeciCoder-1B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 37.0 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 37.0 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 49.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 73.9 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 13.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 38.4 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 43.3 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 38.4 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.0 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.9 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.9 GB
Fastest
3,080 tok/s
DeciCoder-1B is small enough at 1.1B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q8_0 and producing around 33.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 3,080 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Where it came from
DeciCoder-1B was published by Deci AI, in Israel, in August 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing code generation.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 86.5 tokens per second; 799 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
What went into building it
Producing it required around 2.9 × 10²¹ FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
The training set ran to roughly 446,000,000,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for DeciCoder-1B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold DeciCoder-1B — around 1.9 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for DeciCoder-1B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes DeciCoder-1B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for DeciCoder-1B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 3,080 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs DeciCoder-1B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond DeciCoder-1B.
Answers
DeciCoder-1B — common questions
How much VRAM does DeciCoder-1B need?
About 1.9 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run DeciCoder-1B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.9 GB and generating roughly 574 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DeciCoder-1B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.9 GB and generating roughly 351 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DeciCoder-1B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.9 GB and generating roughly 435 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DeciCoder-1B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.9 GB and generating roughly 516 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is DeciCoder-1B open source?
Its weights are published, so DeciCoder-1B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does DeciCoder-1B have?
DeciCoder-1B has 1.1B parameters. 1.1B, per model card https://huggingface.co/Deci/DeciCoder-1b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created DeciCoder-1B?
DeciCoder-1B was published by Deci AI, based in Israel, categorised as industry.
When was DeciCoder-1B released?
DeciCoder-1B was published in August 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is DeciCoder-1B used for?
DeciCoder-1B works in Language, and is recorded as handling code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download DeciCoder-1B?
The weights for DeciCoder-1B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train DeciCoder-1B?
Around 2.9 × 10²¹ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run DeciCoder-1B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for DeciCoder-1B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run DeciCoder-1B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold DeciCoder-1B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for DeciCoder-1B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run DeciCoder-1B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these DeciCoder-1B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 1,848–4,928 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run DeciCoder-1B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds DeciCoder-1B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.9 GB, and produces roughly 33.5 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is DeciCoder-1B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 3,080 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 799 of the cards that can run DeciCoder-1B clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.