MinerU2.5 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 30.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
2,824 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run MinerU2.5?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,824
tok/s
1,694–4,518 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,824
tok/s
1,694–4,518 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,255
tok/s
1,353–3,607 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,255
tok/s
1,353–3,607 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,803
tok/s
1,082–2,885 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,726
tok/s
1,036–2,761 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,726
tok/s
1,036–2,761 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,652
tok/s
991–2,643 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,466
tok/s
880–2,346 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,466
tok/s
880–2,346 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,466
tok/s
880–2,346 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,391
tok/s
834–2,225 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,186
tok/s
712–1,897 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,186
tok/s
712–1,897 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,186
tok/s
712–1,897 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,186
tok/s
712–1,897 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,186
tok/s
712–1,897 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
903
tok/s
542–1,445 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
903
tok/s
542–1,445 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
752
tok/s
451–1,204 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
736
tok/s
442–1,178 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
720
tok/s
432–1,152 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
720
tok/s
432–1,152 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
720
tok/s
432–1,152 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
720
tok/s
432–1,152 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Shanghai AI Lab,Peking University,Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 29 September 2025
- Authors
- Junbo Niu, Zheng Liu, Zhuangcheng Gu, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Tao Chu, Tianyao He, Fan Wu, Qintong Zhang, Zhenjiang Jin, Guang Liang, Rui Zhang, Wenzheng Zhang, Yuan Qu, Zhifei Ren, Yuefeng Sun, Yuanhong Zheng, Dongsheng Ma, Zirui Tang, Boyu Niu, Ziyang Miao, Hejun Dong, Siyi Qian, Junyuan Zhang, Jingzhou Chen, Fangdong Wang, Xiaomeng Zhao, Liqun Wei, Wei Li, Shasha Wang, Ruiliang Xu…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language, Vision, Multimodal
- Task
- Visual question answering, Character recognition (OCR)
- Base model
- Qwen2-VL-2B,Qwen2-0.5B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.2B
- Training data
- tokens
558K 665K 6.9M 630K - amount of samples on each stage
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- opendatalab
agpl-3.0 https://huggingface.co/opendatalab/MinerU2.5-2509-1.2B https://github.com/opendatalab/MinerU
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- MinerU2.5: A Decoupled Vision-Language Model for Efficient High-Resolution Document Parsing
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for MinerU2.5
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,824 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,824 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,255 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,255 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,803 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,726 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,726 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,652 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,466 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,466 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run MinerU2.5
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 33.9 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 33.9 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 45.2 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 67.8 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 12.0 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 35.2 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 39.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 35.2 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 28.5 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 2.0 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 29.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
2.0 GB
Fastest
2,824 tok/s
MinerU2.5 is small enough at 1.2B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla C1080: 4 GB of memory, Q8_0 compression, roughly 30.7 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 2,824 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
MinerU2.5 was published by Shanghai AI Lab,Peking University,Shanghai Jiao Tong University, in China, in September 2025. academia,Academia,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as doing visual question answering, Character recognition (OCR).
It builds on Qwen2-VL-2B,Qwen2-0.5B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the opendatalab organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 79.3 tokens per second, and 799 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for MinerU2.5
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against MinerU2.5 — around 2.0 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context MinerU2.5 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of MinerU2.5 — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for MinerU2.5. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 2,824 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs MinerU2.5 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once MinerU2.5 is settled.
Answers
MinerU2.5 — common questions
How accurate are these MinerU2.5 speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 1,694–4,518 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run MinerU2.5?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds MinerU2.5 is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 2.0 GB, and produces roughly 30.7 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is MinerU2.5 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 2,824 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 799 of the cards that can run MinerU2.5 clear that.
How much VRAM does MinerU2.5 need?
About 2.0 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run MinerU2.5 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.0 GB and generating roughly 526 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MinerU2.5 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.0 GB and generating roughly 322 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MinerU2.5 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.0 GB and generating roughly 399 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MinerU2.5 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.0 GB and generating roughly 473 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is MinerU2.5 open source?
Its weights are published, so MinerU2.5 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does MinerU2.5 have?
MinerU2.5 has 1.2B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created MinerU2.5?
MinerU2.5 was published by Shanghai AI Lab,Peking University,Shanghai Jiao Tong University, based in China, categorised as academia,Academia,Academia.
When was MinerU2.5 released?
MinerU2.5 was published in September 2025.
What is MinerU2.5 used for?
MinerU2.5 works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as handling visual question answering, Character recognition (OCR). These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download MinerU2.5?
Its weights are published under the opendatalab organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run MinerU2.5 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for MinerU2.5 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run MinerU2.5 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for MinerU2.5 only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for MinerU2.5?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run MinerU2.5, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.