Llama 2-13B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
11 GB · Q3_K_M · 36.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
261 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama 2-13B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
295 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
261
tok/s
222–313 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
261
tok/s
222–313 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
166
tok/s
100–266 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
135–191 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
135–191 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
128
tok/s
109–154 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
73.0
tok/s
62–88 |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 10.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
73.0
tok/s
62–88 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 10.1 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
69.5
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
68.0
tok/s
41–109 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
56–80 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
56–80 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 16.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 18 July 2023
- Authors
- Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan,…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling
- Approach
- Supervised
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 13B
- Training data
- 2,000,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
- Batch size
- 4,000,000
Llama has been released in 7B, 13B, and 70B variants.
2 trillion tokens ~= 1.5 trillion words
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.6 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
13 billion parameters * 2 trillion tokens * 6 FLOP / token / parameter = 1.6e23 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Compute cost
- $235,478
- Data centre
- Meta’s Research Super Cluster
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
Llama 2 license. can't use outputs to train models. https://github.com/meta-llama/llama/blob/main/LICENSE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- Historical significance,Significant use,Highly cited
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 16,911
Model has been open-sourced and frequently downloaded. The paper claims that Llama 2 is the current best open-source chat model as of its release date.
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama 2-13B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 166 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 152 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama 2-13B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB · needs 9.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 54.2 tok/s
- 02 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB · needs 9.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.2 tok/s
- 03 Switch 2 GPU 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 8.2 tok/s
- 04 Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 5070 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 53.8 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 53.8 tok/s
- 07 Arc B580 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 7800M 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 38.4 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 12 GB · needs 10.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 40.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Memory needed
9.4 GB
Fastest
261 tok/s
Llama 2-13B reaches a parameter count of 13B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 295.
The least hardware that works is GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, with a memory capacity of 11 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 36.2 tokens per second.
The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 261 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Llama 2-13B was published by Meta AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during July 2023. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 24.2 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 258 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
How it was trained
The training run consumed about 1.6 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
It was trained on a corpus of about 2,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
It is tracked in the underlying dataset for one reason in particular: historical significance,Significant use,Highly cited.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama 2-13B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Llama 2-13B, needing around 9.4 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting Llama 2-13B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Llama 2-13B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 261 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Llama 2-13B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Llama 2-13B.
Answers
Llama 2-13B — common questions
Llama 2-13B— who created it?
It was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Llama 2-13B— when was it released?
It was published in July 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Llama 2-13B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Llama 2-13B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Llama 2-13B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 1.6 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Llama 2-13B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 1.9 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Llama 2-13B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 295. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Llama 2-13B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Llama 2-13B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 222–313 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Llama 2-13B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, with a memory capacity of 11 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 9.4 GB, and produces roughly 36.2 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 295.
Llama 2-13B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 261 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 258.
Llama 2-13B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 9.4 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Llama 2-13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of IQ4_XS, using about 10.1 GB and generating roughly 73.0 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Llama 2-13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 13.9 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Llama 2-13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 16.9 GB and generating roughly 43.7 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 2-13B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Llama 2-13B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 13B. Llama has been released in 7B, 13B, and 70B variants. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.