MMS-1B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 36.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
3,388 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run MMS-1B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3,388
tok/s
2,033–5,421 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,388
tok/s
2,033–5,421 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,706
tok/s
1,623–4,329 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,706
tok/s
1,623–4,329 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,164
tok/s
1,298–3,462 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,071
tok/s
1,243–3,314 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,071
tok/s
1,243–3,314 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,982
tok/s
1,189–3,171 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,759
tok/s
1,055–2,815 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,759
tok/s
1,055–2,815 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,759
tok/s
1,055–2,815 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,669
tok/s
1,001–2,670 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,423
tok/s
854–2,277 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,423
tok/s
854–2,277 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,423
tok/s
854–2,277 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,423
tok/s
854–2,277 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,423
tok/s
854–2,277 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,084
tok/s
650–1,734 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,084
tok/s
650–1,734 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
903
tok/s
542–1,445 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
884
tok/s
530–1,414 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
864
tok/s
518–1,382 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
864
tok/s
518–1,382 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
864
tok/s
518–1,382 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
864
tok/s
518–1,382 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 22 May 2023
- Authors
- Vineel Pratap, Andros Tjandra, Bowen Shi, Paden Tomasello, Arun Babu, Sayani Kundu, Ali Elkahky, Zhaoheng Ni, Apoorv Vyas, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Alexei Baevski, Yossi Adi, Xiaohui Zhang, Wei-Ning Hsu, Alexis Conneau, Michael Auli
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Speech
- Task
- Speech recognition (ASR)
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1B
- Training data
- 13,610,520,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 7.13
https://huggingface.co/facebook/mms-1b-all/tree/main
491K hours in mono 16 kHz = 7,856,000,000 samples
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Chips used
- 64
- Power draw
- 51.0 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Open (non-commercial)
CC-BY-NC 4.0 (non commercial)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 621
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Scaling Speech Technology to 1,000+ Languages
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run MMS-1B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,388 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,388 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,706 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,706 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 2,164 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 2,071 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 2,071 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,982 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,759 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,759 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run MMS-1B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 40.7 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 40.7 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 54.2 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 81.3 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 14.5 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 42.3 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 47.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 42.3 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 34.1 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 35.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.8 GB
Fastest
3,388 tok/s
MMS-1B is small enough at 1B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q8_0, for about 36.9 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 3,388 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
MMS-1B was published by Meta AI, in United States of America, in May 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Speech, and is recorded as doing speech recognition (ASR).
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 95.1 tokens per second, and 806 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
Around 13,610,520,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for MMS-1B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what MMS-1B actually needs — around 1.8 GB at Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for MMS-1B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage MMS-1B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for MMS-1B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 3,388 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means MMS-1B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once MMS-1B is settled.
Answers
MMS-1B — common questions
How many parameters does MMS-1B have?
MMS-1B has 1B parameters. https://huggingface.co/facebook/mms-1b-all/tree/main. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created MMS-1B?
MMS-1B was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was MMS-1B released?
MMS-1B was published in May 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is MMS-1B used for?
MMS-1B works in Speech, and is recorded as handling speech recognition (ASR). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download MMS-1B?
The weights for MMS-1B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run MMS-1B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded MMS-1B is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run MMS-1B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for MMS-1B only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for MMS-1B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run MMS-1B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these MMS-1B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 2,033–5,421 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run MMS-1B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds MMS-1B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.8 GB, and produces roughly 36.9 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is MMS-1B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 3,388 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 806 of the cards that can run MMS-1B clear that.
How much VRAM does MMS-1B need?
About 1.8 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run MMS-1B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 631 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MMS-1B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 386 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MMS-1B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 479 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MMS-1B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 568 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is MMS-1B open source?
Its weights are published, so MMS-1B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.