OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 37.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
3,434 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3,434
tok/s
2,060–5,494 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,434
tok/s
2,060–5,494 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,742
tok/s
1,645–4,387 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,742
tok/s
1,645–4,387 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,193
tok/s
1,316–3,509 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,099
tok/s
1,259–3,358 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,099
tok/s
1,259–3,358 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,009
tok/s
1,205–3,214 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,783
tok/s
1,070–2,853 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,783
tok/s
1,070–2,853 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,783
tok/s
1,070–2,853 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,691
tok/s
1,015–2,706 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,442
tok/s
865–2,308 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,442
tok/s
865–2,308 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,442
tok/s
865–2,308 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,442
tok/s
865–2,308 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,442
tok/s
865–2,308 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,098
tok/s
659–1,757 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,098
tok/s
659–1,757 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
915
tok/s
549–1,464 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
896
tok/s
537–1,433 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
876
tok/s
525–1,401 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
876
tok/s
525–1,401 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
876
tok/s
525–1,401 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
876
tok/s
525–1,401 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 16 April 2023
- Authors
- Ross Wightman, Romain Beaumont, Cade Gordon, Vaishaal Shankar
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Image captioning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 986.7M
- Training data
- tokens
See row 2 of the csv here: https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_clip/blob/main/docs/openclip_results.csv
The model is said to have seen 44B samples (https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_clip?tab=readme-ov-file#openclip).
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Open (restricted use)
https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_clip custom license
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OpenCLIP
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,434 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 3,434 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,742 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,742 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 2,193 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 2,099 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 2,099 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,009 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,783 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,783 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 41.2 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 41.2 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 54.9 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 82.4 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 14.6 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 42.9 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 48.2 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 42.9 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 34.6 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 35.7 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.8 GB
Fastest
3,434 tok/s
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu is small enough at 986.7M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q8_0, for about 37.4 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 3,434 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Where it came from
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu was published by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), in United States of America, in April 2023. The organisation is categorised as academia.
It works in Vision, and is recorded as doing image captioning.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 96.4 tokens per second; 806 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu actually needs — around 1.8 GB at Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 3,434 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu — common questions
What is OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu used for?
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu works in Vision, and is recorded as handling image captioning. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu?
The weights for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu appears at 1 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 2,060–5,494 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.8 GB, and produces roughly 37.4 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 3,434 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 806 of the cards that can run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu clear that.
How much VRAM does OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu need?
About 1.8 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 640 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 392 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 485 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.8 GB and generating roughly 575 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu open source?
Its weights are published, so OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu have?
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu has 986.7M parameters. See row 2 of the csv here: https://github.com/mlfoundations/open_clip/blob/main/docs/openclip_results.csv. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu?
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu was published by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), based in United States of America, categorised as academia.
When was OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu released?
OpenCLIP ViT-H-14-378-quickgelu was published in April 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.