Hybrid H3-2.7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 13.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,255 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Hybrid H3-2.7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,255
tok/s
753–2,008 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,255
tok/s
753–2,008 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,002
tok/s
601–1,603 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,002
tok/s
601–1,603 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
801
tok/s
481–1,282 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
767
tok/s
460–1,227 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
767
tok/s
460–1,227 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
734
tok/s
440–1,175 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
618
tok/s
371–989 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
401
tok/s
241–642 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
401
tok/s
241–642 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
334
tok/s
201–535 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
327
tok/s
196–524 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Stanford University,University at Buffalo
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 28 December 2022
- Authors
- Daniel Y. Fu, Tri Dao, Khaled K. Saab, Armin W. Thomas, Atri Rudra, Christopher Ré
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 2.7B
- Training data
- 400,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 509.02
- Batch size
- 1,048,576
2.7B
"We train hybrid models at sizes 125M, 355M, 1.3B, and 2.7B on the Pile [21] for 400B tokens"
512 * 2048 was for 1.3B, but probably same
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 6.5 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6 FLOP/token/parameter * 400000000000 training tokens * 2700000000 parameters = 6.48e+21 FLOP ___________________ in the algorithmic progress paper the estimation was 8.49 × 10^20 based on the assumption of WT-103 dataset and 509 epochs
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Chips used
- 8
- Power draw
- 6.4 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
apache 2.0 repo (weights and inference only): https://github.com/HazyResearch/H3/blob/main/README.md
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Likely
- Citations
- 636
- Benchmark data
- Hybrid H3-2.7B
Results table shows SOTA performance for some benchmarks not absolute SOTA, only among same size models
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hungry Hungry Hippos: Towards Language Modeling with State Space Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Hybrid H3-2.7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,255 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,255 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 1,002 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 1,002 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 801 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 767 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 767 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 734 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 652 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 652 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Hybrid H3-2.7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 20.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 30.1 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 5.4 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.7 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 17.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.7 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 12.6 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 13.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.6 GB
Fastest
1,255 tok/s
Hybrid H3-2.7B is small enough at 2.7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla C1080. Its 4 GB is enough at Q8_0 compression, giving roughly 13.7 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 1,255 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
Hybrid H3-2.7B was published by Stanford University,University at Buffalo, in United States of America, in December 2022. The organisation is categorised as academia,Academia.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 35.2 tokens per second; 775 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 6.5 × 10²¹ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
The training set ran to roughly 400,000,000,000 tokens.
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Hybrid H3-2.7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold Hybrid H3-2.7B — around 3.6 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Hybrid H3-2.7B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes Hybrid H3-2.7B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Hybrid H3-2.7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 1,255 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Hybrid H3-2.7B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Hybrid H3-2.7B.
Answers
Hybrid H3-2.7B — common questions
Who created Hybrid H3-2.7B?
Hybrid H3-2.7B was published by Stanford University,University at Buffalo, based in United States of America, categorised as academia,Academia.
When was Hybrid H3-2.7B released?
Hybrid H3-2.7B was published in December 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Hybrid H3-2.7B used for?
Hybrid H3-2.7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Hybrid H3-2.7B?
The weights for Hybrid H3-2.7B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Hybrid H3-2.7B?
Around 6.5 × 10²¹ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Hybrid H3-2.7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Hybrid H3-2.7B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Hybrid H3-2.7B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Hybrid H3-2.7B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Hybrid H3-2.7B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Hybrid H3-2.7B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Hybrid H3-2.7B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 753–2,008 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Hybrid H3-2.7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Hybrid H3-2.7B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 3.6 GB, and produces roughly 13.7 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Hybrid H3-2.7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 1,255 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 775 of the cards that can run Hybrid H3-2.7B clear that.
How much VRAM does Hybrid H3-2.7B need?
About 3.6 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Hybrid H3-2.7B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 234 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Hybrid H3-2.7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 143 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Hybrid H3-2.7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 177 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Hybrid H3-2.7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 210 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Hybrid H3-2.7B open source?
Its weights are published, so Hybrid H3-2.7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Hybrid H3-2.7B have?
Hybrid H3-2.7B has 2.7B parameters. 2.7B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.