OPT-66B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
A100 PCIe 40 GB
40 GB · Q3_K_M · 27.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
51.3 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OPT-66B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
61 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.3
tok/s
31–82 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.3
tok/s
31–82 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.0
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.0
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
32.8
tok/s
20–52 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
31.4
tok/s
19–50 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
31.4
tok/s
19–50 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
30.0
tok/s
18–48 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27.7
tok/s
17–44 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 40.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 32.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 32.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 32.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
26.7
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.7
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
26.7
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
25.3
tok/s
15–40 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.6
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
21.6
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.6
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
21.6
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
21.6
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
19.9
tok/s
12–32 · low confidence |
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Mar 2025 | 40.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
18.8
tok/s
11–30 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 64 GB NVIDIA | 64 GB | 2,020 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 56.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 71.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 21 June 2022
- Authors
- Susan Zhang∗ , Stephen Roller∗ , Naman Goyal∗ , Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, Todor Mihaylov, Myle Ott† , Sam Shleifer† , Kurt Shuster, Daniel Simig, Punit Singh Koura, Anjali Sridhar, Tianlu Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 66B
- Training data
- 180,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1.67
- Batch size
- 2,000,000
"Our final corpus contains roughly 180B tokens."
Table 1
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.1 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
OPT-66B was trained for 140k steps, using a batch size of 2M tokens (see the OPT baselines logbook and Table 1 in Zhang et al. (2022), respectively), so training took 140e3 ∗ 2e6 ∗ 66e9 ∗ 6 = 1.1e23 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Open source
non-commercial for weights: https://ai.meta.com/blog/democratizing-access-to-large-scale-language-models-with-opt-175b/ training code (MIT) https://github.com/facebookresearch/metaseq/blob/main/docs/training.md
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 4,716
- Benchmark data
- OPT-66B
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OPT-66B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 51.3 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 51.3 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 41.0 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 41.0 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 32.8 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 31.4 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 31.4 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 30.0 tok/s
- 09 GRID A100B 48 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q4_K_M 27.7 tok/s
- 10 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · 1,560 GB/s · Q3_K_M 27.0 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OPT-66B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 A800 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 32.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 02 A100 PCIe 40 GB 40 GB · needs 32.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 03 A100 SXM4 40 GB 40 GB · needs 32.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 04 Radeon PRO W7900D 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 10.0 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 19.9 tok/s
- 06 RTX 5880 Ada Generation 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.8 tok/s
- 07 L20 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.8 tok/s
- 08 Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 10.0 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7900 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 10.0 tok/s
- 10 Data Center GPU Max 1100 48 GB · needs 40.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 11.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
A100 PCIe 40 GB
Memory needed
32.9 GB
Fastest
51.3 tok/s
OPT-66B reaches a parameter count of 66B. That puts it above consumer hardware, into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. The number of cards we track that can hold it: 61.
At the low end it is handled by A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 27.0 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 51.3 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Where it came from
OPT-66B was published by Meta AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during June 2022. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
Understanding the speeds
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 13.1 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 52 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
How it was trained
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 1.1 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
The training set ran to roughly 180,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OPT-66B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card able to hold OPT-66B, needing around 32.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by OPT-66B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for OPT-66B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 51.3 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of OPT-66B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for OPT-66B.
Answers
OPT-66B — common questions
OPT-66B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
OPT-66B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 66B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
OPT-66B— who created it?
It was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
OPT-66B— when was it released?
It was published in June 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
OPT-66B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
OPT-66B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
OPT-66B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 1.1 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
OPT-66B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 11.8 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
OPT-66B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 61. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
OPT-66B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
OPT-66B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 31–82 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
OPT-66B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is A100 PCIe 40 GB, with a memory capacity of 40 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 32.9 GB, and produces roughly 27.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 61.
OPT-66B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 51.3 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 52.
OPT-66B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 32.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.