OPT-2.7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 13.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,255 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OPT-2.7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,255
tok/s
753–2,008 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,255
tok/s
753–2,008 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,002
tok/s
601–1,603 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,002
tok/s
601–1,603 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
801
tok/s
481–1,282 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
767
tok/s
460–1,227 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
767
tok/s
460–1,227 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
734
tok/s
440–1,175 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
652
tok/s
391–1,042 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
618
tok/s
371–989 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
527
tok/s
316–843 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
401
tok/s
241–642 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
401
tok/s
241–642 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
334
tok/s
201–535 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
327
tok/s
196–524 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
320
tok/s
192–512 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 21 June 2022
- Authors
- Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, Todor Mihaylov, Myle Ott, Sam Shleifer, Kurt Shuster, Daniel Simig, Punit Singh Koura, Anjali Sridhar, Tianlu Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 2.7B
- Training data
- 180,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1.67
- Batch size
- 1,000,000
"How many instances are there in total (of each type, if appropriate)? The training data contains 180B tokens corresponding to 800 GB of data."
Table 1
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Open source
non-commercial for weights: https://ai.meta.com/blog/democratizing-access-to-large-scale-language-models-with-opt-175b/ code is MIT: https://github.com/facebookresearch/metaseq
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 4,716
- Benchmark data
- OPT-2.7B
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OPT-2.7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,255 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,255 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 1,002 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 1,002 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 801 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 767 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 767 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 734 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 652 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 652 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OPT-2.7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 20.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 30.1 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 5.4 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.7 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 17.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 15.7 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 12.6 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.6 GB · Q8_0 · tight 13.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.6 GB
Fastest
1,255 tok/s
OPT-2.7B is small enough at 2.7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla C1080: 4 GB of memory, Q8_0 compression, roughly 13.7 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 1,255 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
OPT-2.7B was published by Meta AI, in United States of America, in June 2022. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 35.2 tokens per second, and 775 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
It was trained on about 180,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OPT-2.7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against OPT-2.7B — around 3.6 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for OPT-2.7B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of OPT-2.7B — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for OPT-2.7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 1,255 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means OPT-2.7B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond OPT-2.7B.
Answers
OPT-2.7B — common questions
How many parameters does OPT-2.7B have?
OPT-2.7B has 2.7B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created OPT-2.7B?
OPT-2.7B was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was OPT-2.7B released?
OPT-2.7B was published in June 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is OPT-2.7B used for?
OPT-2.7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling, Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download OPT-2.7B?
The weights for OPT-2.7B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run OPT-2.7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but OPT-2.7B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run OPT-2.7B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 818 cards already able to run OPT-2.7B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for OPT-2.7B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run OPT-2.7B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these OPT-2.7B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 753–2,008 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run OPT-2.7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds OPT-2.7B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 3.6 GB, and produces roughly 13.7 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is OPT-2.7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 1,255 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 775 of the cards that can run OPT-2.7B clear that.
How much VRAM does OPT-2.7B need?
About 3.6 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run OPT-2.7B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 234 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OPT-2.7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 143 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OPT-2.7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 177 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OPT-2.7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.6 GB and generating roughly 210 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is OPT-2.7B open source?
Its weights are published, so OPT-2.7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.