GPT-NeoX-20B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Quadro K6000
12 GB · Q3_K_M · 14.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
169 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run GPT-NeoX-20B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
293 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
169
tok/s
102–271 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
169
tok/s
102–271 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108
tok/s
65–173 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99.1
tok/s
59–159 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.0
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–134 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71.2
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.2
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 12.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
54.2
tok/s
33–87 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54.2
tok/s
33–87 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.1
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 10.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
52.1
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 10.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
46.9
tok/s
28–75 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
45.2
tok/s
27–72 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.2
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 22.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- EleutherAI
- Organisation type
- Research collective
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 9 February 2022
- Authors
- Sid Black, Stella Biderman, Eric Hallahan, Quentin Anthony, Leo Gao, Laurence Golding, Horace He, Connor Leahy, Kyle McDonell, Jason Phang, Michael Pieler, USVSN Sai Prashanth, Shivanshu Purohit, Laria Reynolds, Jonathan Tow, Ben Wang, Samuel Weinbach
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Numerical format
- FP16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 20B
- Training data
- 341,173,367,965 tokens
- Epochs
- 1.4
- Batch size
- 3,150,000
"In aggregate, the Pile consists of over 825GiB of raw text data" Figure 4
"we opt to use the same batch size as OpenAI’s 175B model–approximately 3.15M tokens, or 1538 contexts of 2048 tokens each, and train for a total of 150,000 steps"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 9.3 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
Trained for 3 months on 96 A100s (according to correspondence with author). Let's say 0.4 utilization rate.
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Chips used
- 96
- Chip-hours
- 207,360
- Wall-clock time
- 2,160 hours (90 days)
- Power draw
- 77.3 kW
- Compute cost
- $184,273
see other notes
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
Apache 2.0. training code: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Historical significance
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 998
- Benchmark data
- GPT-NeoX-20B
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run GPT-NeoX-20B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 108 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 104 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 104 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.1 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 88.0 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 88.0 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run GPT-NeoX-20B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Switch 2 GPU 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 5.9 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5070 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.4 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.4 tok/s
- 05 Arc B580 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 7800M 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.8 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 12 GB · needs 10.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Quadro K6000
Memory needed
10.5 GB
Fastest
169 tok/s
GPT-NeoX-20B reaches a parameter count of 20B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 293.
The least hardware that works is Quadro K6000, with a memory capacity of 12 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 14.0 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 169 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Where it came from
GPT-NeoX-20B was published by EleutherAI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during February 2022. The category the publisher falls under is research collective.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 20.6 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 248 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 9.3 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Training consumed a corpus of around 341,173,367,965 tokens of text.
It is tracked in the underlying dataset for one reason in particular: historical significance.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for GPT-NeoX-20B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card able to hold GPT-NeoX-20B, needing around 10.5 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by GPT-NeoX-20B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for GPT-NeoX-20B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 169 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of GPT-NeoX-20B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond GPT-NeoX-20B.
Answers
GPT-NeoX-20B — common questions
GPT-NeoX-20B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 102–271 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
GPT-NeoX-20B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Quadro K6000, with a memory capacity of 12 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 10.5 GB, and produces roughly 14.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 293.
GPT-NeoX-20B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 169 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 248.
GPT-NeoX-20B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 10.5 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
GPT-NeoX-20B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 10.5 GB and generating roughly 52.1 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
GPT-NeoX-20B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q4_K_M, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
GPT-NeoX-20B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 17.5 GB and generating roughly 41.2 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
GPT-NeoX-20B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
GPT-NeoX-20B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 20B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
GPT-NeoX-20B— who created it?
It was published by EleutherAI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as research collective.
GPT-NeoX-20B— when was it released?
It was published in February 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
GPT-NeoX-20B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
GPT-NeoX-20B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
GPT-NeoX-20B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 9.3 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
GPT-NeoX-20B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 2.9 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
GPT-NeoX-20B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 293. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
GPT-NeoX-20B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.