Japanese-GPT-1B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 28.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
2,606 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Japanese-GPT-1B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,664
tok/s
999–2,663 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,525
tok/s
915–2,440 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,284
tok/s
770–2,054 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
695
tok/s
417–1,111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
680
tok/s
408–1,088 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- rinna
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Japan
- Published
- 19 January 2022
- Authors
- Kei Sawada, Tianyu Zhao, Makoto Shing, Kentaro Mitsui, Akio Kaga, Yukiya Hono, Toshiaki Wakatsuki, Koh Mitsuda
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.3B
- Training data
- tokens
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- This repository provides a 1.3B-parameter Japanese GPT model. The model was trained by rinna Co., Ltd.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Japanese-GPT-1B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,664 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,525 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Japanese-GPT-1B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 41.7 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 62.6 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 11.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 36.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 26.3 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 27.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
2.1 GB
Fastest
2,606 tok/s
Japanese-GPT-1B is small enough at 1.3B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q8_0, for about 28.4 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 2,606 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Japanese-GPT-1B was published by rinna, in Japan, in January 2022. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 73.2 tokens per second, and 797 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Japanese-GPT-1B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold Japanese-GPT-1B — around 2.1 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Japanese-GPT-1B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Japanese-GPT-1B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for Japanese-GPT-1B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 2,606 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Japanese-GPT-1B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Japanese-GPT-1B is settled.
Answers
Japanese-GPT-1B — common questions
Can I run Japanese-GPT-1B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 368 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Japanese-GPT-1B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 437 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Japanese-GPT-1B open source?
Its weights are published, so Japanese-GPT-1B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Japanese-GPT-1B have?
Japanese-GPT-1B has 1.3B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Japanese-GPT-1B?
Japanese-GPT-1B was published by rinna, based in Japan, categorised as industry.
When was Japanese-GPT-1B released?
Japanese-GPT-1B was published in January 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Japanese-GPT-1B used for?
Japanese-GPT-1B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Japanese-GPT-1B?
The weights for Japanese-GPT-1B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run Japanese-GPT-1B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Japanese-GPT-1B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Japanese-GPT-1B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 818 cards already able to run Japanese-GPT-1B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Japanese-GPT-1B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Japanese-GPT-1B, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Japanese-GPT-1B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 1,564–4,170 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Japanese-GPT-1B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Japanese-GPT-1B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 2.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.4 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Japanese-GPT-1B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 2,606 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 797 of the cards that can run Japanese-GPT-1B clear that.
How much VRAM does Japanese-GPT-1B need?
About 2.1 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Japanese-GPT-1B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 485 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Japanese-GPT-1B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 297 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.