Engine-Medium(NE) TPS calculator

Open weights Boston University 355M parameters December 2021

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

818 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Tesla C1080

4 GB · Q8_0 · 104 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

9,544 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run Engine-Medium(NE)?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

818 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
9,544 tok/s

5,727–15,271 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
9,544 tok/s

5,727–15,271 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
7,621 tok/s

4,573–12,194 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
7,621 tok/s

4,573–12,194 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
6,095 tok/s

3,657–9,752 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
5,834 tok/s

3,500–9,334 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
5,834 tok/s

3,500–9,334 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
5,583 tok/s

3,350–8,933 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,955 tok/s

2,973–7,928 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,955 tok/s

2,973–7,928 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,955 tok/s

2,973–7,928 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,701 tok/s

2,820–7,521 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,009 tok/s

2,405–6,414 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,009 tok/s

2,405–6,414 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,009 tok/s

2,405–6,414 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,009 tok/s

2,405–6,414 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
4,009 tok/s

2,405–6,414 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
3,052 tok/s

1,831–4,884 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
3,052 tok/s

1,831–4,884 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,544 tok/s

1,526–4,070 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Jan 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,489 tok/s

1,494–3,983 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel 128 GB 3,210 GB/s Jan 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,434 tok/s

1,460–3,894 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,434 tok/s

1,460–3,894 · low confidence

A100X NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Jun 2021 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,434 tok/s

1,460–3,894 · low confidence

A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Aug 2022 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
2,434 tok/s

1,460–3,894 · low confidence

H100 CNX NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Mar 2023 1.1 GB Q8_0 Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
Boston University
Organisation type
Academia
Country
United States of America
Published
11 December 2021
Authors
Zhongping Zhang, Yiwen Gu, Bryan A. Plummer

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language, Vision, Multimodal
Task
Named entity recognition (NER)

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
355M

"ENGINE-Medium has 24 layers and 355 million parameters, on par with GPT2-355M and GROVER-Large"

Training data
602,871,200 tokens
Epochs
3

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code
Open source

MIT, code and weights: https://github.com/Zhongping-Zhang/ENGINE

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Record confidence
Confident
Citations
3
Benchmark data
Engin-Medium(NE)

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
Show and Write: Entity-aware Article Generation with Image Information
Last updated
25 May 2026

The extremes

What the numbers mean

The hardware side

Minimum card

Tesla C1080

Memory needed

1.1 GB

Fastest

9,544 tok/s

Engine-Medium(NE) is small enough at 355M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.

At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q8_0, for about 104 tokens per second.

Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 9,544 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.

Where it came from

Engine-Medium(NE) was published by Boston University, in United States of America, in December 2021. academia is the category the publisher falls under.

It works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as doing named entity recognition (NER).

The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.

Understanding the speeds

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 268.0 tokens per second, and 817 exceed reading speed outright.

Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.

Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.

What went into building it

The training set ran to roughly 602,871,200 tokens.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for Engine-Medium(NE)

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Start from the memory column

    Every card here has been checked against Engine-Medium(NE) — around 1.1 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.

  2. 02

    Set the context length you will work at

    Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Engine-Medium(NE).

  3. 03

    Choose how far you will compress it

    Compression is what makes Engine-Medium(NE) fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.

  4. 04

    Sort by speed

    Ranking by tokens per second for Engine-Medium(NE) follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 9,544 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Read the fit column last

    The fit column separates cards that just manage Engine-Medium(NE) from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.

  6. 06

    Check the card from the other side

    Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Engine-Medium(NE) is settled.

Answers

Engine-Medium(NE) — common questions

01

What is Engine-Medium(NE) used for?

Engine-Medium(NE) works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as handling named entity recognition (NER). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

02

Where can I download Engine-Medium(NE)?

The weights for Engine-Medium(NE) are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

03

Can I run Engine-Medium(NE) if it does not fit in my GPU?

Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for Engine-Medium(NE) assume it is fully resident.

04

Would two GPUs run Engine-Medium(NE) faster?

A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 818 cards already able to run Engine-Medium(NE) alone, the case for pairing is weak.

05

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Engine-Medium(NE)?

A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Engine-Medium(NE), 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.

06

How accurate are these Engine-Medium(NE) speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 5,727–15,271 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.

07

What GPU do I need to run Engine-Medium(NE)?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Engine-Medium(NE) is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.1 GB, and produces roughly 104 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.

08

How fast is Engine-Medium(NE) on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 9,544 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 817 of the cards that can run Engine-Medium(NE) clear that.

09

How much VRAM does Engine-Medium(NE) need?

About 1.1 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

10

Can I run Engine-Medium(NE) on a 8 GB GPU?

Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,778 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

11

Can I run Engine-Medium(NE) on a 12 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,089 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

12

Can I run Engine-Medium(NE) on a 16 GB GPU?

Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,348 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

13

Can I run Engine-Medium(NE) on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,599 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

14

Is Engine-Medium(NE) open source?

Its weights are published, so Engine-Medium(NE) can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

15

How many parameters does Engine-Medium(NE) have?

Engine-Medium(NE) has 355M parameters. "ENGINE-Medium has 24 layers and 355 million parameters, on par with GPT2-355M and GROVER-Large". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

16

Who created Engine-Medium(NE)?

Engine-Medium(NE) was published by Boston University, based in United States of America, categorised as academia.

17

When was Engine-Medium(NE) released?

Engine-Medium(NE) was published in December 2021. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 25 May 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.