ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 28.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
2,606 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,664
tok/s
999–2,663 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,525
tok/s
915–2,440 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,284
tok/s
770–2,054 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
695
tok/s
417–1,111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
680
tok/s
408–1,088 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- University of Washington,Facebook AI Research,Allen Institute for AI
- Organisation type
- Academia,Industry,Research collective
- Country
- United States of America, France
- Published
- 27 August 2021
- Authors
- Ofir Press, Noah A. Smith, Mike Lewis
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.3B
- Training data
- tokens
- Epochs
- 205
"The training set is about 103 million tokens from English Wikipedia"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 8.1 × 10²⁰ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
From figure 5, 6000 GPU hours (Nvidia V100) 6000* 125 teraflop/s * 3600 * 0.3 = 8.1e20
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
weights and training/inference code, MIT: https://github.com/ofirpress/attention_with_linear_biases
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 1,194
- Benchmark data
- ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,664 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,525 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 41.7 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 62.6 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 11.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 36.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 26.3 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 27.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
2.1 GB
Fastest
2,606 tok/s
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) is small enough at 1.3B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla C1080. Its 4 GB is enough at Q8_0 compression, giving roughly 28.4 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 2,606 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) was published by University of Washington,Facebook AI Research,Allen Institute for AI, in United States of America, in August 2021. academia,Industry,Research collective is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 73.2 tokens per second, and 797 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 8.1 × 10²⁰ FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) — around 2.1 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072).
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 2,606 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072).
Answers
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) — common questions
Can I run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 485 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 297 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 368 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 437 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) open source?
Its weights are published, so ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) have?
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) has 1.3B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) was published by University of Washington,Facebook AI Research,Allen Institute for AI, based in United States of America, categorised as academia,Industry,Research collective.
When was ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) released?
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) was published in August 2021. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) used for?
ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
The weights for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
Around 8.1 × 10²⁰ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) appears at 1 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 1,564–4,170 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072)?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 2.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.4 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 2,606 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 797 of the cards that can run ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) clear that.
How much VRAM does ALiBi (L=3072, Lvalid = 3072) need?
About 2.1 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.