SEER TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 28.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
2,606 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run SEER?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,606
tok/s
1,564–4,170 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,081
tok/s
1,249–3,330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,664
tok/s
999–2,663 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,593
tok/s
956–2,549 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,525
tok/s
915–2,440 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,353
tok/s
812–2,165 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,284
tok/s
770–2,054 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,095
tok/s
657–1,751 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
834
tok/s
500–1,334 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
695
tok/s
417–1,111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
680
tok/s
408–1,088 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
665
tok/s
399–1,063 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Facebook AI Research,INRIA
- Organisation type
- Industry,Academia
- Country
- United States of America, France
- Published
- 29 July 2021
- Authors
- Priya Goyal, Mathilde Caron, Benjamin Lefaudeux, Min Xu, Pengchao Wang, Vivek Pai, Mannat Singh, Vitaliy Liptchinsky, Ishan Misra, Armand Joulin, Piotr Bojanowski
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Image embedding, Image classification
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Numerical format
- FP16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.3B
- Training data
- 1,000,000,000 tokens
From abstract: " Our final SElf-supERvised (SEER) model, a RegNetY with 1.3B parameters..."
"Overall, we train on 1B images for a total of 122K iterations."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.8 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
Numbers from section 3.2, they specifically mention using mixed precision training. 6125 ms / batch * 114890 batches = 8.14 days (they round to 8 in the text) 512 GPUs * 8.14 days * 24h/day * 3600s/h * 125 TFLOP/s * 0.4 (assumed utilization) = 1.800e22 "on 512 V100 32GB NVIDIA GPUs. Training this model on 1 billion images requires 114, 890 training iterations for a batch size of 8, 704 images, summing to 8 days of training over 512 GPUs."
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA V100
- Chips used
- 512
- Chip-hours
- 98,304
- Wall-clock time
- 196 hours (8.1 days)
- Power draw
- 310.4 kW
- Compute cost
- $34,114
6125 ms / batch * 114890 batches = 195.5 hours
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Open (non-commercial)
https://github.com/facebookresearch/vissl/tree/main/projects/SEER We share instructions on how to train SEER model on GPUs using PyTorch. First, Install VISSL and follow the data setup instructions to easily setup your data input with VISSL. https://github.com/facebookresearch/vissl/blob/main/projects/SEER/MODEL_LICENSE.md
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 301
SOTA for self-supervised models on ImageNet, which seems fair to consider a different benchmark than ImageNet for supervised models. "Our final SElf-supERvised (SEER) model, a RegNetY with 1.3B parameters trained on 1B random images with 512 GPUs achieves 84.2% top-1 accuracy, surpassing the best self-supervised pretrained model by 1%"
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wild
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run SEER
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,606 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,081 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,664 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,593 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,525 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,353 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run SEER
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 31.3 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 41.7 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 62.6 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 11.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 36.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.5 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 26.3 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 2.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 27.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
2.1 GB
Fastest
2,606 tok/s
SEER is small enough at 1.3B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla C1080: 4 GB of memory, Q8_0 compression, roughly 28.4 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 2,606 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Where it came from
SEER was published by Facebook AI Research,INRIA, in United States of America, in July 2021. industry,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Vision, and is recorded as doing image embedding, Image classification.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 73.2 tokens per second; 797 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
What went into building it
Training it took roughly 1.8 × 10²² FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA V100 — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
It was trained on about 1,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for SEER
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold SEER — around 2.1 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason SEER stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage SEER by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for SEER is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 2,606 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage SEER from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once SEER is settled.
Answers
SEER — common questions
Can I run SEER on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 368 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run SEER on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 437 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is SEER open source?
Its weights are published, so SEER can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does SEER have?
SEER has 1.3B parameters. From abstract: " Our final SElf-supERvised (SEER) model, a RegNetY with 1.3B parameters...". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created SEER?
SEER was published by Facebook AI Research,INRIA, based in United States of America, categorised as industry,Academia.
When was SEER released?
SEER was published in July 2021. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is SEER used for?
SEER works in Vision, and is recorded as handling image embedding, Image classification. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download SEER?
The weights for SEER are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train SEER?
Around 1.8 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA V100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run SEER if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for SEER assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run SEER faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for SEER only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for SEER?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run SEER, 1 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these SEER speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 1,564–4,170 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run SEER?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds SEER is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 2.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.4 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is SEER on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 2,606 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 797 of the cards that can run SEER clear that.
How much VRAM does SEER need?
About 2.1 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run SEER on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 485 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run SEER on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 2.1 GB and generating roughly 297 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.