EMDR TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 83.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
7,701 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run EMDR?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
7,701
tok/s
4,620–12,321 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
7,701
tok/s
4,620–12,321 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,149
tok/s
3,689–9,839 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,149
tok/s
3,689–9,839 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,918
tok/s
2,951–7,868 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,707
tok/s
2,824–7,531 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,707
tok/s
2,824–7,531 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,505
tok/s
2,703–7,208 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,998
tok/s
2,399–6,397 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,998
tok/s
2,399–6,397 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,998
tok/s
2,399–6,397 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,793
tok/s
2,276–6,068 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,234
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,234
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,234
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,234
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,234
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,463
tok/s
1,478–3,940 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,463
tok/s
1,478–3,940 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,052
tok/s
1,231–3,284 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,008
tok/s
1,205–3,213 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,964
tok/s
1,178–3,142 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,964
tok/s
1,178–3,142 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,964
tok/s
1,178–3,142 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,964
tok/s
1,178–3,142 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Mila - Quebec AI (originally Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms),McGill University,DeepMind
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Industry
- Country
- Canada, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Published
- 9 June 2021
- Authors
- Devendra Singh Sachan, Siva Reddy, William Hamilton, Chris Dyer, Dani Yogatama
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Question answering
- Numerical format
- FP16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 440M
- Training data
- 171,600,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 4.05
Table 2
At the time of publication there were about 4B words (5.3B tokens) on English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia#Yearly_statistics BookCorpus has about 1B words (1.3B tokens), C4 has about 156B tokens, and OpenWebText has about 9B tokens. From Table 6, it looks like all datasets were trained on for over one epoch. BERT: 1M steps, batches of 256, sequence length 256 = 65.5B tokens vs 6.6B in Wikipedia + BookCorpus ICT: 100k steps, batches of 4096, sequence leng…
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.9 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
"We run all of our experiments on a machine with 96 CPUs, 1.3TB physical memory, and 16 A100 GPUs. We use PyTorch (Paszke et al., 2019) to implement our proposed model. With this hardware setup, our experiments on NQ and TriviaQA took approximately 25 hours to complete, while experiments on WebQ took roughly 8 hours to complete. Before supervised training, we also perform a one-time unsupervised MSS pre-training for 82,000 steps that took roughly 1 week." 1 week + 25 hours * 16 A100s = ~193 * 1…
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100
- Wall-clock time
- 355 hours (14.8 days)
- Compute cost
- $2,773
"We run all of our experiments on a machine with 96 CPUs, 1.3TB physical memory, and 16 A100 GPUs [...] our experiments on NQ and TriviaQA took approximately 25 hours to complete, while experiments on WebQ took roughly 8 hours to complete. Before supervised training, we also perform a one-time unsupervised MSS pre-training for 82,000 steps that took roughly 1 week" Additionally, they pre-trained BERT, ICT, and T5 models, which took a combined 8.733e20 FLOPs. On 16 A100s at 0.3 utilization, that…
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
https://github.com/DevSinghSachan/emdr2 training scripts: https://github.com/DevSinghSachan/emdr2/tree/main/examples
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 191
"Experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms all existing approaches of comparable size by 2-3% absolute exact match points, achieving new state-of-the-art results."
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answering
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run EMDR
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 7,701 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 7,701 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 6,149 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 6,149 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 4,918 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 4,707 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 4,707 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 4,505 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 3,998 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 3,998 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run EMDR
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 92.4 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 92.4 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 123 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 185 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 32.8 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 96.1 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 108 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 96.1 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 77.6 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 80.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.2 GB
Fastest
7,701 tok/s
EMDR is small enough at 440M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla C1080. Its 4 GB is enough at Q8_0 compression, giving roughly 83.8 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 7,701 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Where it came from
EMDR was published by Mila - Quebec AI (originally Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms),McGill University,DeepMind, in Canada, in June 2021. The organisation is categorised as academia,Academia,Industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 216.2 tokens per second; 817 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
Producing it required around 1.9 × 10²¹ FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA A100, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
The training set ran to roughly 171,600,000,000 tokens.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for EMDR
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what EMDR actually needs — around 1.2 GB at Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for EMDR.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of EMDR — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for EMDR is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 7,701 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage EMDR from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for EMDR alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
EMDR — common questions
How much VRAM does EMDR need?
About 1.2 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run EMDR on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 1,434 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run EMDR on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 878 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run EMDR on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 1,088 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run EMDR on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.2 GB and generating roughly 1,290 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is EMDR open source?
Its weights are published, so EMDR can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does EMDR have?
EMDR has 440M parameters. Table 2. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created EMDR?
EMDR was published by Mila - Quebec AI (originally Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms),McGill University,DeepMind, based in Canada, categorised as academia,Academia,Industry.
When was EMDR released?
EMDR was published in June 2021. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is EMDR used for?
EMDR works in Language, and is recorded as handling question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download EMDR?
The weights for EMDR are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train EMDR?
Around 1.9 × 10²¹ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run EMDR if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for EMDR assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run EMDR faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 818 cards already able to run EMDR alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for EMDR?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard EMDR has to be squeezed — 1 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these EMDR speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 4,620–12,321 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run EMDR?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds EMDR is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.2 GB, and produces roughly 83.8 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is EMDR on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 7,701 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 817 of the cards that can run EMDR clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.