German ELECTRA Large TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 110 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
10,114 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run German ELECTRA Large?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10,114
tok/s
6,068–16,183 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
10,114
tok/s
6,068–16,183 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
8,076
tok/s
4,846–12,922 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
8,076
tok/s
4,846–12,922 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,459
tok/s
3,875–10,335 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,182
tok/s
3,709–9,892 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
6,182
tok/s
3,709–9,892 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,917
tok/s
3,550–9,467 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,251
tok/s
3,151–8,402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,251
tok/s
3,151–8,402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,251
tok/s
3,151–8,402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,981
tok/s
2,989–7,970 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,248
tok/s
2,549–6,797 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,248
tok/s
2,549–6,797 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,248
tok/s
2,549–6,797 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,248
tok/s
2,549–6,797 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,248
tok/s
2,549–6,797 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,235
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,235
tok/s
1,941–5,175 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,695
tok/s
1,617–4,313 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,638
tok/s
1,583–4,221 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,579
tok/s
1,547–4,127 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,579
tok/s
1,547–4,127 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,579
tok/s
1,547–4,127 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,579
tok/s
1,547–4,127 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- deepset,Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Muenchen
- Organisation type
- Industry,Government
- Country
- Germany
- Published
- 21 October 2020
- Authors
- Branden Chan, Stefan Schweter, Timo Möller
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Document classification, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 335M
- Training data
- 36,383,733,333 tokens
335M from Table 5
163.4GB from Table 1 in the paper assuming 167M words per GB (German Language) we have 163.4 * 167M * 4/3 tokens per word = 36,383,733,333
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.4 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
flops = (64) * (123* 10**12) * (7 * 24 * 3600) * (0.3) = 1.4e21 (num gpu) * (peak flops) * (time in seconds) * (assumed utilization rate) 'large models were trained on pods of 16 TPUs v3 (128 cores).' - from section 4.1 it was trained for 7 days from Table 2 Agrees with 6CN: Tokens seen: 512 (seq len) * 1024 (batch size) * 1 million (steps) = 5.24e11 FLOPs: 6 * 335M * 5.24e11 = 1.05e21
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v3
- Chips used
- 64
- Chip-hours
- 10,752
- Wall-clock time
- 168 hours (7 days)
- Power draw
- 58.6 kW
- Compute cost
- $2,392
7 days from Table 2
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- deepset
MIT: https://huggingface.co/deepset/gelectra-large
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 333
'we were able to attain SoTA performance across a set of document classification and named entity recognition (NER) tasks for both models of base and large size.'
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- German's Next Language Model
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run German ELECTRA Large
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 10,114 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 10,114 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 8,076 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 8,076 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 6,459 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 6,182 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 6,182 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 5,917 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 5,251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 5,251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run German ELECTRA Large
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 121 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 121 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 162 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 243 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 43.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 126 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 142 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 126 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 102 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.1 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 105 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.1 GB
Fastest
10,114 tok/s
German ELECTRA Large reaches a parameter count of 335M. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.
The least hardware that works is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q8_0 and producing around 110 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 10,114 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
German ELECTRA Large was published by deepset,Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Muenchen, in the country recorded as Germany, during October 2020. The category the publisher falls under is industry,Government.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of document classification, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation deepset.
What decides the speed
The median result is around 284.0 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 818 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
Training it took a computation budget of roughly 1.4 × 10²¹ FLOP, on hardware recorded as Google TPU v3. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Training consumed a corpus of around 36,383,733,333 tokens of text.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all: sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for German ELECTRA Large
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of German ELECTRA Large, needing around 1.1 GB at a compression of Q8_0. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by German ELECTRA Large.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for German ELECTRA Large. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 10,114 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of German ELECTRA Large. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on German ELECTRA Large.
Answers
German ELECTRA Large — common questions
German ELECTRA Large— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 1. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
German ELECTRA Large— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 6,068–16,183 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
German ELECTRA Large— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q8_0 using about 1.1 GB, and produces roughly 110 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.
German ELECTRA Large— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 10,114 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 818.
German ELECTRA Large— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 1.1 GB at a compression of Q8_0, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
German ELECTRA Large— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,884 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
German ELECTRA Large— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,154 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
German ELECTRA Large— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,429 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
German ELECTRA Large— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 1.1 GB and generating roughly 1,694 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
German ELECTRA Large— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
German ELECTRA Large— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 335M. 335M from Table 5. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
German ELECTRA Large— who created it?
It was published by deepset,Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Muenchen, based in Germany, an organisation categorised as industry,Government.
German ELECTRA Large— when was it released?
It was published in October 2020. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
German ELECTRA Large— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of document classification, Named entity recognition (NER), Text classification. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
German ELECTRA Large— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation deepset. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
German ELECTRA Large— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 1.4 × 10²¹ FLOP, on hardware recorded as Google TPU v3. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
German ELECTRA Large— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
German ELECTRA Large— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.