XLM TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 55.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
5,095 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run XLM?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5,095
tok/s
3,057–8,152 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
5,095
tok/s
3,057–8,152 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,069
tok/s
2,441–6,510 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
4,069
tok/s
2,441–6,510 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,254
tok/s
1,952–5,206 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,114
tok/s
1,869–4,983 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
3,114
tok/s
1,869–4,983 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,981
tok/s
1,788–4,769 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,645
tok/s
1,587–4,232 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,645
tok/s
1,587–4,232 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,645
tok/s
1,587–4,232 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,509
tok/s
1,506–4,015 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,140
tok/s
1,284–3,424 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,140
tok/s
1,284–3,424 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,140
tok/s
1,284–3,424 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,140
tok/s
1,284–3,424 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,140
tok/s
1,284–3,424 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,629
tok/s
978–2,607 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,629
tok/s
978–2,607 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,358
tok/s
815–2,173 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,329
tok/s
797–2,126 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,299
tok/s
780–2,079 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,299
tok/s
780–2,079 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,299
tok/s
780–2,079 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,299
tok/s
780–2,079 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 1.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 1 June 2019
- Authors
- Guillaume Lample, Alexis Conneau
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Translation, Language modeling
- Numerical format
- FP16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 665M
- Training data
- tokens
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Open (non-commercial)
weights/code non-commercial: https://github.com/facebookresearch/XLM?tab=License-1-ov-file#readme
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Highly cited,SOTA improvement
- Citations
- 2,986
"On supervised machine translation, we obtain a new state of the art of 38.5 BLEU on WMT’16 Romanian-English, outperforming the previous best approach by more than 4 BLEU"
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run XLM
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 5,095 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 5,095 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 4,069 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 4,069 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 3,254 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 3,114 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 3,114 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,981 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 2,645 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 2,645 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run XLM
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 61.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 61.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 81.5 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 122 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 21.7 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 63.6 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 71.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 63.6 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 51.3 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 1.4 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 53.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
1.4 GB
Fastest
5,095 tok/s
XLM is small enough at 665M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q8_0, for about 55.4 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 5,095 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Background
XLM was published by Facebook, in United States of America, in June 2019. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing translation, Language modeling.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 143.1 tokens per second; 809 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
How it was trained
Its inclusion criterion is highly cited,SOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for XLM
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against XLM — around 1.4 GB at Q8_0. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context XLM can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes XLM fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for XLM. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 5,095 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs XLM but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once XLM is settled.
Answers
XLM — common questions
When was XLM released?
XLM was published in June 2019. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is XLM used for?
XLM works in Language, and is recorded as handling translation, Language modeling. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download XLM?
The weights for XLM are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run XLM if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for XLM assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run XLM faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold XLM on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for XLM?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and XLM appears at 1 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these XLM speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 3,057–8,152 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run XLM?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds XLM is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 1.4 GB, and produces roughly 55.4 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is XLM on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 5,095 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 809 of the cards that can run XLM clear that.
How much VRAM does XLM need?
About 1.4 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run XLM on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 949 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run XLM on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 581 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run XLM on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 720 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run XLM on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 1.4 GB and generating roughly 853 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is XLM open source?
Its weights are published, so XLM can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does XLM have?
XLM has 665M parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created XLM?
XLM was published by Facebook, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.