dots.llm1 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
A100 SXM4 80 GB
80 GB · Q3_K_M · 16.4 tok/s
Fastest card
H100 NVL 94 GB
28.9 tok/s · 94 GB
Which GPUs can run dots.llm1?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
37 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
28.9
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 78.3 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
27.2
tok/s
16–44 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 103.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
27.0
tok/s
16–43 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 78.3 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 78.3 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 78.3 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
23.9
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 152.7 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
23.9
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 152.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
22.1
tok/s
13–35 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 103.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
21.2
tok/s
13–34 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 119.7 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
21.2
tok/s
13–34 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 119.7 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
19.1
tok/s
11–30 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 152.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
19.1
tok/s
11–30 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 152.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
16.4
tok/s
10–26 · low confidence |
H800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
15.6
tok/s
9–25 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
15.6
tok/s
9–25 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 1,940 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 70.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
14.0
tok/s
8–22 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 152.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
13.6
tok/s
8–22 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 103.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
13.6
tok/s
8–22 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 103.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Rednote
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 6 July 2025
- Authors
- Bi Huo, Bin Tu, Cheng Qin, Da Zheng, Debing Zhang, Dongjie Zhang, En Li, Fu Guo, Jian Yao, Jie Lou, Junfeng Tian, Li Hu, Ran Zhu, Shengdong Chen, Shuo Liu, Su Guang, Te Wo, Weijun Zhang, Xiaoming Shi, Xinxin Peng, Xing Wu, Yawen Liu, Yuqiu Ji, Ze Wen, Zhenhai Liu, Zichao Li, Zilong Liao
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 142B
- Training data
- 11,328,000,000,000 tokens
- Batch size
- 128,000,000
a large-scale MoE model that activates 14 billion parameters out of a total of 142 billion parameters
pre-training: "11.2T high-quality tokens" long context: 128B tokens 11.328T tokens total
"We progressively increase the batch size from 64M tokens initially to 96M tokens at 6T tokens, and finally to 128M tokens at 8.3T tokens."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.2 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
6 FLOP/parameter/token * 14000000000 active parameters * 11328000000000 tokens = 9.51552e+23 FLOP 989000000000000 FLOP/GPU/sec [H800 assumed] * 1456000 GPU-hours * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 1.55518272e+24 FLOP sqrt(9.51552e+23*1.55518272e+24) = 1.2164856e+24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H800 SXM5
- Chip-hours
- 1,456,000
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- rednote-hilab
MIT license https://huggingface.co/rednote-hilab/dots.llm1.inst
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- dots.llm1 Technical Report
- Last updated
- 19 December 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for dots.llm1
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 H100 NVL 94 GB 94 GB · 3,940 GB/s · IQ4_XS 28.9 tok/s
- 02 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q5_K_M 27.2 tok/s
- 03 H800 SXM5 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q3_K_M 27.0 tok/s
- 04 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · 3,360 GB/s · Q3_K_M 27.0 tok/s
- 05 H100 PCIe 96 GB 96 GB · 3,360 GB/s · IQ4_XS 24.6 tok/s
- 06 H100 SXM5 94 GB 94 GB · 3,360 GB/s · IQ4_XS 24.6 tok/s
- 07 H100 SXM5 96 GB 96 GB · 3,360 GB/s · IQ4_XS 24.6 tok/s
- 08 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 23.9 tok/s
- 09 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 23.9 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 22.1 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run dots.llm1
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 H100 CNX 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
- 02 H800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
- 03 H800 SXM5 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 04 A800 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.6 tok/s
- 05 H100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
- 06 H100 SXM5 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 07 A800 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
- 08 A100 PCIe 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.6 tok/s
- 09 A100X 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
- 10 A100 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB · needs 70.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
A100 SXM4 80 GB
Memory needed
70.1 GB
Fastest
28.9 tok/s
dots.llm1 sits at 142B parameters, which puts it above consumer hardware and into the range where a card is bought for this purpose rather than repurposed for it. 37 of the cards we track can hold it.
The entry point is the A100 SXM4 80 GB: 80 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 16.4 tokens per second.
A H100 NVL 94 GB is the fastest we calculate for it: about 28.9 tokens per second, from 3,940 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Background
dots.llm1 was published by Rednote, in China, in July 2025. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the rednote-hilab organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 16.4 tokens per second; 35 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 1.2 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H800 SXM5. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
It was trained on about 11,328,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for dots.llm1
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what dots.llm1 actually needs — around 70.1 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason dots.llm1 stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of dots.llm1 — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for dots.llm1 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the H100 NVL 94 GB tops it at 28.9 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs dots.llm1 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond dots.llm1.
Answers
dots.llm1 — common questions
Who created dots.llm1?
dots.llm1 was published by Rednote, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was dots.llm1 released?
dots.llm1 was published in July 2025.
What is dots.llm1 used for?
dots.llm1 works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download dots.llm1?
Its weights are published under the rednote-hilab organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train dots.llm1?
Around 1.2 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H800 SXM5. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run dots.llm1 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 21.8 GB. Our figures for dots.llm1 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run dots.llm1 faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 37 cards already able to run dots.llm1 alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for dots.llm1?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard dots.llm1 has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these dots.llm1 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 17–46 tok/s on the H100 NVL 94 GB rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run dots.llm1?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds dots.llm1 is the A100 SXM4 80 GB, with 80 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 70.1 GB, and produces roughly 16.4 tokens per second. 37 cards in total can run it.
How fast is dots.llm1 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a H100 NVL 94 GB at about 28.9 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 35 of the cards that can run dots.llm1 clear that.
How much VRAM does dots.llm1 need?
About 70.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is dots.llm1 open source?
Its weights are published, so dots.llm1 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does dots.llm1 have?
dots.llm1 has 142B parameters. a large-scale MoE model that activates 14 billion parameters out of a total of 142 billion parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.