LSTM (2018) TPS calculator

Open weights Intel Labs,Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) 13M parameters March 2018

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

818 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Tesla C1080

4 GB · Q8_0 · 2,836 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

260,633 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run LSTM (2018)?

Set the inputs, read the answer

Context length tokens

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Minimum quality

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

Search cards

Card memory

Also show cards that cannot run it

818 cards match

Calculating

					Needs	Quantisation	Fit
260,633 tok/s 156,380–417,014 · low confidence	B200 NVIDIA	180 GB	8,000 GB/s	Jan 2024	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
260,633 tok/s 156,380–417,014 · low confidence	B300 NVIDIA	288 GB	8,000 GB/s	Sep 2025	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
208,122 tok/s 124,873–332,996 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
208,122 tok/s 124,873–332,996 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
166,447 tok/s 99,868–266,315 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD	128 GB	6,550 GB/s	Jan 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
159,312 tok/s 95,587–254,900 · low confidence	H200 NVL NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
159,312 tok/s 95,587–254,900 · low confidence	H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
152,471 tok/s 91,482–243,953 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD	256 GB	6,000 GB/s	Oct 2024	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135,318 tok/s 81,191–216,508 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD	128 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135,318 tok/s 81,191–216,508 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135,318 tok/s 81,191–216,508 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
128,362 tok/s 77,017–205,379 · low confidence	H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,940 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109,466 tok/s 65,680–175,146 · low confidence	H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109,466 tok/s 65,680–175,146 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Oct 2022	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109,466 tok/s 65,680–175,146 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109,466 tok/s 65,680–175,146 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109,466 tok/s 65,680–175,146 · low confidence	H800 SXM5 NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
83,351 tok/s 50,010–133,361 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
83,351 tok/s 50,010–133,361 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
69,459 tok/s 41,675–111,134 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Jan 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
67,976 tok/s 40,786–108,762 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel	128 GB	3,210 GB/s	Jan 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
66,462 tok/s 39,877–106,338 · low confidence	A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Nov 2020	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
66,462 tok/s 39,877–106,338 · low confidence	A100X NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Jun 2021	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
66,462 tok/s 39,877–106,338 · low confidence	A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Aug 2022	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
66,462 tok/s 39,877–106,338 · low confidence	H100 CNX NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Mar 2023	0.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation: Intel Labs,Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)
Organisation type: Industry,Academia
Country: United States of America
Published: 4 March 2018
Authors: Shaojie Bai, J. Zico Kolter, Vladlen Koltun

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain: Language
Task: Language modeling

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters: 13M
Training data: 103,000,000 tokens

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights: Open — downloadable
Model access: Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code: Open source

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Citations: 6,496
Benchmark data: LSTM (2018)

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference: An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling
Last updated: 25 May 2026

The extremes

The ten fastest GPUs that run LSTM (2018)

Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.

The smallest GPUs that still run LSTM (2018)

The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.

What the numbers mean

What it takes to run this model

Minimum card

Tesla C1080

Memory needed

0.7 GB

Fastest

260,633 tok/s

LSTM (2018) reaches a parameter count of 13M. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.

The smallest card that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q8_0 and producing around 2,836 tokens per second.

The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 260,633 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

Background

LSTM (2018) was published by Intel Labs,Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), in the country recorded as United States of America, during March 2018. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry,Academia.

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling.

The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.

Reading the throughput figures

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 7,318.6 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 818 of them.

Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.

Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.

How it was trained

The training set ran to roughly 103,000,000 tokens of text.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for LSTM (2018)

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

01

Start from the memory column

The table lists every card able to hold LSTM (2018), needing around 0.7 GB at a compression of Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
02

Set the context length you will work at

The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by LSTM (2018).
03

Set a quality floor

The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
04

Sort by speed

The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for LSTM (2018). It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 260,633 tok/s.
05

Check the fit verdict before buying

A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of LSTM (2018). Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
06

See what else that card runs

Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on LSTM (2018).

Answers

LSTM (2018) — common questions

LSTM (2018)— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 29,725 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

LSTM (2018)— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?

Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 36,814 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

LSTM (2018)— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 43,656 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

LSTM (2018)— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

LSTM (2018)— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 13M. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

LSTM (2018)— who created it?

It was published by Intel Labs,Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry,Academia.

LSTM (2018)— when was it released?

It was published in March 2018. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

LSTM (2018)— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.

LSTM (2018)— where can I download it?

The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

LSTM (2018)— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

LSTM (2018)— would two GPUs run it faster?

Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

LSTM (2018)— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 1. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

LSTM (2018)— how accurate are these speed estimates?

They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 156,380–417,014 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

LSTM (2018)— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q8_0 using about 0.7 GB, and produces roughly 2,836 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.

LSTM (2018)— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 260,633 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 818.

LSTM (2018)— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 0.7 GB at a compression of Q8_0, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

LSTM (2018)— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?

Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 48,543 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 25 May 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.

All AI models