DenseNet201 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 1,843 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
169,412 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run DenseNet201?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
169,412
tok/s
101,647–271,059 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
169,412
tok/s
101,647–271,059 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135,280
tok/s
81,168–216,447 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135,280
tok/s
81,168–216,447 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108,191
tok/s
64,914–173,105 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
103,553
tok/s
62,132–165,685 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
103,553
tok/s
62,132–165,685 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99,106
tok/s
59,464–158,569 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
87,956
tok/s
52,774–140,730 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
87,956
tok/s
52,774–140,730 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
87,956
tok/s
52,774–140,730 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83,435
tok/s
50,061–133,496 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,153
tok/s
42,692–113,845 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,153
tok/s
42,692–113,845 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,153
tok/s
42,692–113,845 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,153
tok/s
42,692–113,845 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
71,153
tok/s
42,692–113,845 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54,178
tok/s
32,507–86,685 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54,178
tok/s
32,507–86,685 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
45,148
tok/s
27,089–72,237 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44,185
tok/s
26,511–70,696 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,200
tok/s
25,920–69,120 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,200
tok/s
25,920–69,120 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,200
tok/s
25,920–69,120 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43,200
tok/s
25,920–69,120 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Tsinghua University,Facebook AI Research,Cornell University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Industry,Academia
- Country
- China, United States of America, France
- Published
- 28 January 2018
- Authors
- Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten, Kilian Q. Weinberger
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Image classification
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 20M
- Training data
- tokens
- Epochs
- 90
Figure 3
On ImageNet, we train models for 90 epochs with a batch size of 256.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
BSD-3-Clause license https://github.com/liuzhuang13/DenseNet
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 43,094
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run DenseNet201
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169,412 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 169,412 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135,280 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 135,280 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 108,191 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 103,553 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 103,553 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99,106 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 87,956 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 87,956 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run DenseNet201
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,033 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,033 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,711 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 4,066 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 722 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,114 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,379 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,114 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,707 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,762 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
0.7 GB
Fastest
169,412 tok/s
DenseNet201 is small enough at 20M parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q8_0 and producing around 1,843 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 169,412 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
DenseNet201 was published by Tsinghua University,Facebook AI Research,Cornell University, in China, in January 2018. academia,Industry,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Vision, and is recorded as doing image classification.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 4,757.1 tokens per second, and 818 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for DenseNet201
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold DenseNet201 — around 0.7 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context DenseNet201 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of DenseNet201 — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for DenseNet201. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 169,412 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means DenseNet201 loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once DenseNet201 is settled.
Answers
DenseNet201 — common questions
What is DenseNet201 used for?
DenseNet201 works in Vision, and is recorded as handling image classification. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download DenseNet201?
The weights for DenseNet201 are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run DenseNet201 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for DenseNet201 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run DenseNet201 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for DenseNet201 only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for DenseNet201?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard DenseNet201 has to be squeezed — 1 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these DenseNet201 speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 101,647–271,059 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run DenseNet201?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds DenseNet201 is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 0.7 GB, and produces roughly 1,843 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is DenseNet201 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 169,412 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 818 of the cards that can run DenseNet201 clear that.
How much VRAM does DenseNet201 need?
About 0.7 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run DenseNet201 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 31,553 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DenseNet201 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 19,321 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DenseNet201 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 23,929 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DenseNet201 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 28,376 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is DenseNet201 open source?
Its weights are published, so DenseNet201 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does DenseNet201 have?
DenseNet201 has 20M parameters. Figure 3. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created DenseNet201?
DenseNet201 was published by Tsinghua University,Facebook AI Research,Cornell University, based in China, categorised as academia,Industry,Academia.
When was DenseNet201 released?
DenseNet201 was published in January 2018. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.