YOLOv2 TPS calculator

Open weights University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI 51M parameters December 2016

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

818 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Tesla C1080

4 GB · Q8_0 · 723 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

66,436 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run YOLOv2?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

818 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
66,436 tok/s

39,862–106,298 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
66,436 tok/s

39,862–106,298 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
53,051 tok/s

31,830–84,881 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
53,051 tok/s

31,830–84,881 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
42,428 tok/s

25,457–67,884 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
40,609 tok/s

24,365–64,974 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
40,609 tok/s

24,365–64,974 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
38,865 tok/s

23,319–62,184 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
34,493 tok/s

20,696–55,188 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
34,493 tok/s

20,696–55,188 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
34,493 tok/s

20,696–55,188 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
32,720 tok/s

19,632–52,352 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27,903 tok/s

16,742–44,645 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27,903 tok/s

16,742–44,645 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27,903 tok/s

16,742–44,645 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27,903 tok/s

16,742–44,645 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27,903 tok/s

16,742–44,645 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
21,246 tok/s

12,748–33,994 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
21,246 tok/s

12,748–33,994 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
17,705 tok/s

10,623–28,328 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Jan 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
17,327 tok/s

10,396–27,724 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel 128 GB 3,210 GB/s Jan 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
16,941 tok/s

10,165–27,106 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
16,941 tok/s

10,165–27,106 · low confidence

A100X NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Jun 2021 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
16,941 tok/s

10,165–27,106 · low confidence

A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Aug 2022 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
16,941 tok/s

10,165–27,106 · low confidence

H100 CNX NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Mar 2023 0.8 GB Q8_0 Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI
Organisation type
Academia,Research collective
Country
United States of America
Published
25 December 2016
Authors
Joseph Redmon, Ali Farhadi

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Vision
Task
Object detection
Numerical format
FP32

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
51M

Source: https://resources.wolframcloud.com/NeuralNetRepository/resources/YOLO-V2-Trained-on-MS-COCO-Data_1

Training data
1,280,000 tokens

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (non-commercial)
Training code
Unreleased

weights here, no license specified: https://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Why it is tracked
Highly cited
Citations
17,523

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Last updated
25 May 2026

The extremes

What the numbers mean

What it takes to run this model

Minimum card

Tesla C1080

Memory needed

0.8 GB

Fastest

66,436 tok/s

YOLOv2 reaches a parameter count of 51M. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.

The smallest card that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q8_0 and producing around 723 tokens per second.

Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 66,436 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

Background

YOLOv2 was published by University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during December 2016. The category the publisher falls under is academia,Research collective.

It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as performing the task of object detection.

Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.

Reading the throughput figures

The median result is around 1,865.5 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 818 of them.

It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.

Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.

What went into building it

It was trained on a corpus of about 1,280,000 tokens of text.

The reason it appears in this catalogue at all: highly cited.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for YOLOv2

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Start from the memory column

    Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of YOLOv2, needing around 0.8 GB at a compression of Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.

  2. 02

    Decide how long your conversations run

    The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by YOLOv2.

  3. 03

    Decide how much compression you will accept

    Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.

  4. 04

    Compare tokens per second, not specifications

    Sort by speed to see how cards rank for YOLOv2. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 66,436 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Read the fit column last

    A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of YOLOv2. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.

  6. 06

    Check the card from the other side

    Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for YOLOv2.

Answers

YOLOv2 — common questions

01

YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?

Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 9,384 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

02

YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 11,128 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

03

YOLOv2— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

04

YOLOv2— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 51M. Source: https://resources.wolframcloud.com/NeuralNetRepository/resources/YOLO-V2-Trained-on-MS-COCO-Data_1. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

05

YOLOv2— who created it?

It was published by University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as academia,Research collective.

06

YOLOv2— when was it released?

It was published in December 2016. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

07

YOLOv2— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as handling the task of object detection. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.

08

YOLOv2— where can I download it?

The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

09

YOLOv2— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

10

YOLOv2— would two GPUs run it faster?

A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

11

YOLOv2— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 1. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

12

YOLOv2— how accurate are these speed estimates?

They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 39,862–106,298 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

13

YOLOv2— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q8_0 using about 0.8 GB, and produces roughly 723 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.

14

YOLOv2— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 66,436 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 818.

15

YOLOv2— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 0.8 GB at a compression of Q8_0, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

16

YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?

Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 12,374 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

17

YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 7,577 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 25 May 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.