YOLOv2 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 723 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
66,436 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run YOLOv2?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66,436
tok/s
39,862–106,298 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66,436
tok/s
39,862–106,298 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
53,051
tok/s
31,830–84,881 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
53,051
tok/s
31,830–84,881 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
42,428
tok/s
25,457–67,884 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40,609
tok/s
24,365–64,974 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40,609
tok/s
24,365–64,974 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38,865
tok/s
23,319–62,184 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34,493
tok/s
20,696–55,188 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34,493
tok/s
20,696–55,188 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34,493
tok/s
20,696–55,188 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
32,720
tok/s
19,632–52,352 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27,903
tok/s
16,742–44,645 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27,903
tok/s
16,742–44,645 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27,903
tok/s
16,742–44,645 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27,903
tok/s
16,742–44,645 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
27,903
tok/s
16,742–44,645 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
21,246
tok/s
12,748–33,994 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
21,246
tok/s
12,748–33,994 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
17,705
tok/s
10,623–28,328 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
17,327
tok/s
10,396–27,724 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16,941
tok/s
10,165–27,106 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16,941
tok/s
10,165–27,106 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16,941
tok/s
10,165–27,106 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
16,941
tok/s
10,165–27,106 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI
- Organisation type
- Academia,Research collective
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 25 December 2016
- Authors
- Joseph Redmon, Ali Farhadi
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Object detection
- Numerical format
- FP32
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 51M
- Training data
- 1,280,000 tokens
Source: https://resources.wolframcloud.com/NeuralNetRepository/resources/YOLO-V2-Trained-on-MS-COCO-Data_1
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
weights here, no license specified: https://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Highly cited
- Citations
- 17,523
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run YOLOv2
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 66,436 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 66,436 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 53,051 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 53,051 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 42,428 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 40,609 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 40,609 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 38,865 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 34,493 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 34,493 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run YOLOv2
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 797 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 797 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,063 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,594 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 283 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 829 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 933 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 829 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 669 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 0.8 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 691 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
0.8 GB
Fastest
66,436 tok/s
YOLOv2 reaches a parameter count of 51M. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.
The smallest card that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q8_0 and producing around 723 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 66,436 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
YOLOv2 was published by University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during December 2016. The category the publisher falls under is academia,Research collective.
It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as performing the task of object detection.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 1,865.5 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 818 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
It was trained on a corpus of about 1,280,000 tokens of text.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all: highly cited.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for YOLOv2
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of YOLOv2, needing around 0.8 GB at a compression of Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by YOLOv2.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for YOLOv2. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 66,436 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of YOLOv2. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for YOLOv2.
Answers
YOLOv2 — common questions
YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 9,384 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 11,128 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
YOLOv2— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
YOLOv2— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 51M. Source: https://resources.wolframcloud.com/NeuralNetRepository/resources/YOLO-V2-Trained-on-MS-COCO-Data_1. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
YOLOv2— who created it?
It was published by University of Washington,Allen Institute for AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as academia,Research collective.
YOLOv2— when was it released?
It was published in December 2016. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
YOLOv2— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Vision, and is recorded as handling the task of object detection. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
YOLOv2— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
YOLOv2— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
YOLOv2— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
YOLOv2— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 1. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
YOLOv2— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 39,862–106,298 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
YOLOv2— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q8_0 using about 0.8 GB, and produces roughly 723 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.
YOLOv2— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 66,436 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 818.
YOLOv2— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 0.8 GB at a compression of Q8_0, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 12,374 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
YOLOv2— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 0.8 GB and generating roughly 7,577 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.