CFSS TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 2,117,647 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
194,636,678 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run CFSS?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
194,636,678
tok/s
116,782,007–311,418,685 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
194,636,678
tok/s
116,782,007–311,418,685 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155,422,253
tok/s
93,253,352–248,675,606 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155,422,253
tok/s
93,253,352–248,675,606 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
124,299,849
tok/s
74,579,909–198,879,758 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118,971,670
tok/s
71,383,002–190,354,671 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118,971,670
tok/s
71,383,002–190,354,671 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
113,862,457
tok/s
68,317,474–182,179,931 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101,052,930
tok/s
60,631,758–161,684,689 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101,052,930
tok/s
60,631,758–161,684,689 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101,052,930
tok/s
60,631,758–161,684,689 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
95,858,564
tok/s
57,515,138–153,373,702 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
81,747,405
tok/s
49,048,443–130,795,848 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
81,747,405
tok/s
49,048,443–130,795,848 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
81,747,405
tok/s
49,048,443–130,795,848 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
81,747,405
tok/s
49,048,443–130,795,848 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
81,747,405
tok/s
49,048,443–130,795,848 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
62,244,810
tok/s
37,346,886–99,591,696 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
62,244,810
tok/s
37,346,886–99,591,696 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51,870,675
tok/s
31,122,405–82,993,080 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
50,763,679
tok/s
30,458,207–81,221,886 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49,632,353
tok/s
29,779,412–79,411,765 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49,632,353
tok/s
29,779,412–79,411,765 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49,632,353
tok/s
29,779,412–79,411,765 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49,632,353
tok/s
29,779,412–79,411,765 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 0.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- SenseTime,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology
- Organisation type
- Industry,Academia
- Country
- Hong Kong, China
- Published
- 7 June 2015
- Authors
- Shizhan Zhu, Cheng Li, Chen Change Loy, Xiaoou Tang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision
- Task
- Face detection
- Approach
- Supervised
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 17.4K
- Training data
- 141,660 tokens
The paper trains two regression models, each using hardcoded SIFT / BRIEF features. 68 keypoints (given in the paper) and 128 dimensional features per keypoint (assumption based on SIFT features) 2*68*128=17408
[images]
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Chips used
- 1
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Likely
https://paperswithcode.com/sota/face-alignment-on-aflw-19 " The framework demonstrates real-time performance and state-of-the-art results on various benchmarks including the challenging 300-W dataset."
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Face alignment by coarse-to-fine shape searching
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run CFSS
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 194,636,678 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 194,636,678 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 155,422,253 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 155,422,253 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 124,299,849 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 118,971,670 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 118,971,670 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 113,862,457 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 101,052,930 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 101,052,930 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run CFSS
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,335,640 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,335,640 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 3,114,187 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 4,671,280 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 829,882 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,429,066 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,732,699 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,429,066 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 1,960,965 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 0.7 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 2,024,221 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
0.7 GB
Fastest
194,636,678 tok/s
CFSS is small enough at 17.4K parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla C1080. Its 4 GB is enough at Q8_0 compression, giving roughly 2,117,647 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 194,636,678 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Background
CFSS was published by SenseTime,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, in Hong Kong, in June 2015. industry,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Vision, and is recorded as doing face detection.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 5,465,397.9 tokens per second, and 818 exceed reading speed outright.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
How it was trained
It was trained on about 141,660 tokens of text.
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for CFSS
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold CFSS — around 0.7 GB at Q8_0. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for CFSS.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of CFSS — Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for CFSS follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 194,636,678 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage CFSS from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once CFSS is settled.
Answers
CFSS — common questions
Can I run CFSS on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 32,601,644 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is CFSS open source?
Its weights are published, so CFSS can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does CFSS have?
CFSS has 17.4K parameters. The paper trains two regression models, each using hardcoded SIFT / BRIEF features. 68 keypoints (given in the paper) and 128 dimensional features per keypoint (assumption based on SIFT features) 2*68*128=17408. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created CFSS?
CFSS was published by SenseTime,Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK),Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, based in Hong Kong, categorised as industry,Academia.
When was CFSS released?
CFSS was published in June 2015. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is CFSS used for?
CFSS works in Vision, and is recorded as handling face detection. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download CFSS?
The weights for CFSS are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run CFSS if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded CFSS is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run CFSS faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold CFSS on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for CFSS?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and CFSS appears at 1 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these CFSS speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 116,782,007–311,418,685 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run CFSS?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds CFSS is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q8_0 using about 0.7 GB, and produces roughly 2,117,647 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is CFSS on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 194,636,678 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 818 of the cards that can run CFSS clear that.
How much VRAM does CFSS need?
About 0.7 GB at Q8_0 compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run CFSS on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 36,251,081 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CFSS on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 22,198,313 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CFSS on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 0.7 GB and generating roughly 27,492,431 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.