Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q4_K_M · 21.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
847 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
541
tok/s
325–866 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
496
tok/s
297–793 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
417
tok/s
355–501 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
226
tok/s
135–361 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
221
tok/s
133–353 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Typhoon / SCB 10X
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Thailand
- Published
- 5 May 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation
- Base model
- Gemma 3 4B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 4B
- Training data
- tokens
4B Model type: A 4B instruct decoder-only model based on Gemma3 architecture.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- scb10x
Gemma license https://huggingface.co/scb10x/typhoon2.1-gemma3-4b
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Typhoon 2.1 Gemma Release: Big Performance in Small Sizes
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 541 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 496 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 31.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 46.9 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 8.3 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 27.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 19.7 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 20.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.2 GB
Fastest
847 tok/s
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B is small enough at 4B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla C1080. Its 4 GB is enough at Q4_K_M compression, giving roughly 21.3 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 847 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
What this model is
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B was published by Typhoon / SCB 10X, in Thailand, in May 2025. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation.
It builds on Gemma 3 4B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the scb10x organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
The median result is around 31.3 tokens per second; 779 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B — around 3.2 GB at Q4_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 847 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B.
Answers
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B — common questions
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B has to be squeezed — 3 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 720–1,016 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 3.2 GB, and produces roughly 21.3 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 847 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 779 of the cards that can run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B clear that.
How much VRAM does Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B need?
About 3.2 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 158 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 96.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 120 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 142 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B open source?
Its weights are published, so Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B have?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B has 4B parameters. 4B Model type: A 4B instruct decoder-only model based on Gemma3 architecture. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B was published by Typhoon / SCB 10X, based in Thailand, categorised as industry.
When was Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B released?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B was published in May 2025.
What is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B used for?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B?
Its weights are published under the scb10x organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down. Our figures for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 818 cards already able to run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 4B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.