Gemma 4 26B A4B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · IQ4_XS · 52.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
747 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
747
tok/s
448–1,195 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
747
tok/s
448–1,195 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
596
tok/s
358–954 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
596
tok/s
358–954 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
477
tok/s
286–763 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
457
tok/s
274–731 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
457
tok/s
274–731 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
437
tok/s
262–699 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
388
tok/s
233–621 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
388
tok/s
233–621 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
388
tok/s
233–621 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
368
tok/s
221–589 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
314
tok/s
188–502 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
314
tok/s
188–502 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
314
tok/s
188–502 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
314
tok/s
188–502 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
314
tok/s
188–502 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
259
tok/s
155–415 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
239
tok/s
143–382 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
239
tok/s
143–382 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 26.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
220
tok/s
132–352 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
206
tok/s
123–329 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Mar 2018 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
206
tok/s
123–329 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
206
tok/s
123–329 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 897 GB/s | Jun 2017 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
205
tok/s
123–329 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti NVIDIA | 16 GB | 896 GB/s | Feb 2025 | 13.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 2 April 2026
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 25.2B
- Training data
- tokens
25.2B total, 3.8B active
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Last updated
- 19 June 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Gemma 4 26B A4B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 747 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 747 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 596 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 477 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 457 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 457 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 437 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 388 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 388 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Gemma 4 26B A4B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 45.8 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 111 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.4 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 66.0 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 22.9 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 57.6 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 103 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 205 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 115 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 115 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.5 GB
Fastest
747 tok/s
Gemma 4 26B A4B reaches a parameter count of 25.2B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
The smallest card that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 52.5 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 747 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Gemma 4 26B A4B was published by Google DeepMind, in the country recorded as United States of America, during April 2026. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation google.
Reading the throughput figures
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 102.7 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 239 of them.
This is a mixture-of-experts model, which routes each token through only part of itself. It therefore generates far faster than its total size suggests — while still needing every parameter resident in memory, so it is quick without being cheap to hold.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Gemma 4 26B A4B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of Gemma 4 26B A4B, needing around 13.5 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting Gemma 4 26B A4B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for Gemma 4 26B A4B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 747 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Gemma 4 26B A4B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Answers
Gemma 4 26B A4B — common questions
Gemma 4 26B A4B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of IQ4_XS, using about 13.5 GB and generating roughly 259 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 20.8 GB and generating roughly 182 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 25.2B. 25.2B total, 3.8B active. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— who created it?
It was published by Google DeepMind, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— when was it released?
It was published in April 2026.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— what is it used for?
and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation google. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 4.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 448–1,195 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 13.5 GB, and produces roughly 52.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 747 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 239.
Gemma 4 26B A4B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 13.5 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.