Gemma 3 4B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q4_K_M · 21.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
847 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Gemma 3 4B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
541
tok/s
325–866 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
496
tok/s
297–793 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
417
tok/s
355–501 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
226
tok/s
135–361 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
221
tok/s
133–353 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 12 March 2025
- Authors
- Core contributors: Aishwarya Kamath, Johan Ferret, Shreya Pathak, Nino Vieillard, Ramona Merhej, Sarah Perrin, Tatiana Matejovicova, Alexandre Ramé, Morgane Rivière, Louis Rouillard, Thomas Mesnard, Geoffrey Cideron, Jean-bastien Grill, Sabela Ramos, Edouard Yvinec, Michelle Casbon, Etienne Pot, Ivo Penchev, Gaël Liu, Francesco Visin, Kathleen Kenealy, Lucas Beyer, Xiaohai Zhai, Anton Tsitsulin, R…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language, Vision, Multimodal
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Chat, Quantitative reasoning, Visual question answering, Code generation
- Base model
- SigLIP 400M
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 4B
- Training data
- 4,000,000,000,000 tokens
Vision Encoder: 417M Embedding Parameters: 675M Non-embedding Parameters: 3,209M
4T
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 9.6 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6ND = 6 * 4B parameters * 4T training tokens = 9.6 × 10^22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v5e
- Chips used
- 2,048
- Power draw
- 904.3 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-4b-it Gemma License
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Gemma 3 Technical Report
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Gemma 3 4B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 541 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 496 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Gemma 3 4B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 31.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 46.9 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 8.3 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 27.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 19.7 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.2 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 20.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.2 GB
Fastest
847 tok/s
Gemma 3 4B is small enough at 4B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at Q4_K_M and producing around 21.3 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 847 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
Where it came from
Gemma 3 4B was published by Google DeepMind, in United States of America, in March 2025. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Chat, Quantitative reasoning, Visual question answering, Code generation.
Its starting point was SigLIP 400M — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the google organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 31.3 tokens per second; 779 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 9.6 × 10²² FLOP, on Google TPU v5e. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
The training set ran to roughly 4,000,000,000,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Gemma 3 4B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Gemma 3 4B — around 3.2 GB at Q4_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Gemma 3 4B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Gemma 3 4B — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for Gemma 3 4B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 847 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage Gemma 3 4B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Gemma 3 4B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Gemma 3 4B — common questions
Can I run Gemma 3 4B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 158 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Gemma 3 4B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 96.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Gemma 3 4B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 120 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Gemma 3 4B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.0 GB and generating roughly 142 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Gemma 3 4B open source?
Its weights are published, so Gemma 3 4B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Gemma 3 4B have?
Gemma 3 4B has 4B parameters. Vision Encoder: 417M Embedding Parameters: 675M Non-embedding Parameters: 3,209M. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Gemma 3 4B?
Gemma 3 4B was published by Google DeepMind, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Gemma 3 4B released?
Gemma 3 4B was published in March 2025.
What is Gemma 3 4B used for?
Gemma 3 4B works in Language, Vision, Multimodal, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Chat, Quantitative reasoning, Visual question answering, Code generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Gemma 3 4B?
Its weights are published under the google organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Gemma 3 4B?
Around 9.6 × 10²² FLOP, on Google TPU v5e. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Gemma 3 4B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Gemma 3 4B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Gemma 3 4B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Gemma 3 4B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Gemma 3 4B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Gemma 3 4B, 3 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Gemma 3 4B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 720–1,016 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Gemma 3 4B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Gemma 3 4B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 3.2 GB, and produces roughly 21.3 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Gemma 3 4B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 847 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 779 of the cards that can run Gemma 3 4B clear that.
How much VRAM does Gemma 3 4B need?
About 3.2 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.